Let's Break Down What Happened With the Bondi Subpoena This Week
The Daily Mail Steps in It Over Shameful Markwayne Mullin Confirmation Hearing Piece
Lisa Murkowski Pitched This Weak Sauce Exemption to the SAVE Act. You're Going...
You Won't Believe Why Democrats are Trying to Kick Chicago Residents Out of...
Police Arrest Man Who Claimed to Be Roblox Programmer for Possessing Child Abuse...
Ron DeSantis Questions Why TSA Exists
Do Democrats Think We're Stupid?
Sen. Markwayne Mullin Set To Be Confirmed As New Head of DHS
L.A. Man Accused of Using Bogus Firms to Score $2M in COVID Relief...
Azerbaijani National Who Is At-Large Charged in $90M Medicare Fraud Scheme
The 17,000 Day War
This New Report Shows Just How Much We're Winning on Immigration
Trump Just Made a Major Move After Democrats Crossed His Red Line
Ken Paxton Returns Fire With a New Ad Targeting John Cornyn
What Tim Pool Says on God’s Omnipotence and the Laws of Logic
Tipsheet

How Paul Ryan's Plan "Ends Medicare"

How Paul Ryan's Plan "Ends Medicare"
A brilliant post by Jeffery Anderson at the Weekly Standard should be required reading for conservatives weary of hearing Democrats lie about the Ryan plan "ending" Medicare.  The fibs are coming
Advertisement
fast and furious:



Before we get to Anderson's incisive statistics and commentary, a few important points.  (1) Both links above lead to dishonest Democratic attacks that either imply, or directly assert, that current seniors will lose Medicare benefits under the Ryan plan.  Untrue.  Nobody over the age of 54 will see any changes to their Medicare benefits or arrangement.  They're all "grandfathered in" to the status-quo system. 

(2) If Democrats are so concerned about current seniors losing their Medicare, why did they slash half a trillion dollars from the program last year?  And why are the feds forcing millions of seniors off of the popular Medicare Advantage program?  Why, to pay for a new government entitlement program the country didn't (and still doesn't) want, of course!  Now, onto Anderson's stubborn facts:


In light of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee’s shameless ad saying that the Paul Ryan-authored House Republican budget would “end Medicare,” it is worth noting that the Congressional Budget Office says that, in 2030, the Republican plan would give the average senior $18,276 in premium support to help purchase private health insurance ($15,000 in 2022, increased by 2.5 percent annually, to keep up with inflation). In addition, lower-income seniors would get another $9,504 to put into a medical savings account (an MSA) to use for additional medical expenses, bringing their annual tally of taxpayer-funded support to $27,780. 

Advertisement

Related:

DEMOCRATS

Remember, that $18,276 figure is just the average premium support future seniors will receive, according to the CBO.  The way the House-passed Ryan program is designed, richer and healthier seniors will get lower government subsidies; sicker and less fortunate seniors will receive more support.  How...reasonable.  And truly indigent seniors will remain dual-eligible for Medicaid, which provides even more federal healthcare assistance (in addition to the Medicare plan's MSA subsidies).  So, setting Medicaid aside -- and focusing solely on Medicare -- how much federal spending will that amount to in 2030?


The Medicare Trustees Report (Table IV.C1) says that in 2030 there will be 80.424 million seniors enrolled in Medicare. Thus, in that year, Ryan’s plan would spend $1.470 trillion on Medicare premium support alone, in addition to the funding for the MSAs. That’s about 50 percent more than we would spend that year, under the Republican budget, on national defense.



As Anderson quips, spending nearly $1.5 Trillion annually on a major government program sure seems like a strange way to "end" it -- doesn't it?

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement