Jamie Raskin's Low Opinion of Women
Thank You, GOD!
The War on Warring
Federal Judge Sentences Abilene Drug Trafficker to Life for Fentanyl Distribution
The Turning Point Halftime Show Crushed Expectations
Jeffries Calls Citizenship Proof ‘Voter Suppression’ as Majority of Americans Back Voter I...
Four Reasons Why the Washington Post Is Dying
Foreign-Born Ohio Lawmaker Pushes 'Sensitive Locations' Bill to Limit ICE Enforcement
TrumpRx Triggers TDS in Elizabeth Warren
Texas Democrat Goes Viral After Pitting Whites Against Minorities
U.S. Secret Service Seized 3 Card Skimmers in Alabama, Stopping $3.1M in Fraud
Jasmine Crockett Finally Added Some Policy to Her Website and It Was a...
No Sanctuary in the Sanctuary
Chromosomes Matter — and Women’s Sports Prove It
The Economy Will Decide Congress — If Republicans Actually Talk About It
Tipsheet

Hilarious: Giannoulias Can't Name A Single Spending Bill He Would Have Opposed

Bravo to the Chicago Tribune editorial board for pressing failed mob banker/US Senate candidate Alexi Giannoulias on a very straightforward question: If you had been in the US Senate over the last two years, which spending bills would you have voted against?  Alexi tries repeatedly to slither away from the issue, but "John" (who I believe to be board member John McCormick) just won't let him off the hook:
Advertisement




It's hard not to squirm listening to Giannoulias' "who me?" routine as he feigns confusion over whether McCormick is seeking a specific answer to a specific question.  McCormick's retort is priceless: "Specifically is how members of Congress vote, so yes."

At this point, you can practically hear Giannoulias enter panic mode.  With flop sweat beading around his temples, he fumbles desperately for a response--any response.  He finally lands on TARP--which, of course, passed under Buuusssshhh--so he assumes it's terra firma for hypothetical opposition.  Thinking he's regained his footing, Alexi assures the Trib's editors that he would have "looked at" TARP and "pushed hard" for greater accountability and oversight (and hey, why not a bailout for his family's failed back, at which he dispensed millions of dollars to known mobsters as a senior loan officer?).  McCormick, still hoping for an actual answer, asks for confirmation that Giannoulias is saying he'd have voted 'no' on TARP.  The jig is up.  Giannoulias backpeddals madly, seeming to concede that he, in fact,
Advertisement
would have joined Mark Kirk in voting 'yes' on TARP--but only if he had "no choice."

McCormick concludes the exchange by succinctly summarizing Giannoulias' decisive leadership qualities: "So we still haven't heard an answer.  There's no answer."  Gold.

Mark Kirk, despite his flaws, would have given a very clear, non-hypothetical answer to this question.  As a sitting Congressman, he did vote (specifically!) against the "stimulus" and every version of Obamacare

Rasmussen's latest poll shows Kirk ahead by four, while the Tribune poll gives Giannoulias a thin edge.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement