Men Are Going to Strike Back
Wait, That's Why Dems Are Scared About ICE Agents Wearing Body Cams
Bill Maher Had the Perfect Response to Billie Eilish's 'Stolen Land' Nonsense
Some Guy Wanted to Test Something at an Anti-ICE Rally. Their Reaction Says...
The Trump Team Quoted the Perfect TV Show to Defend a Proposed WH...
Why This Former CNN Reporter Saying He'd Fire Scott Jennings Is Amusing
Democrats Have Earned All the Bad Things
Bakari Sellers Says America Needs a 'Fumigation' of MAGA
Don Lemon Plays Civil Rights Martyr After Cities Church Mob Arrest
Canadian PM Carney Just Announced a Plan to Make Canadian Inflation Worse
CA Governor Election 2026: Bianco or Hilton
Same Old, Same Old
The Real Purveyors of Jim Crow
The Deep State’s Inversion Matrix Must Be Seen to Be Defeated
Situational Science and Trans Medicine
Tipsheet

The Right To Get High: Pot vs. Tobacco; UPDATE: Pot vs. Alcohol

It's a little noticed paradox: This push to impose more restriction on cigarettes while simultaneously liberalizing access to so-called "medical" marijuana. Fortunately, there's broad consensus on the dangers tobacco poses to your heart, lungs, skin, bones, brain and even reproductive health. Yet marijuana smoke is far more carcinogenic and damaging to lungs; but it's dubbed "medicine," which is supposed to treat, not promote disease. Consider these stats:
Advertisement


http://media.kauz.com/images/medicalmarijuana.jpeg

* One marijuana joint is as damaging as seven cigarettes.

* The tar (condensable residue in smoke) from marijuana has 50% more carcinogens than tobacco tar.

* Regular cannabis smokers can develop lung problems as much as 20 years earlier than their tobacco smoking counterparts. On average, pot smokers developed lung disease by 41 years of age, vs. 65 years of age for tobacco smokers.

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_3WfwzsWpUQ4/SV7d2zSSl8I/AAAAAAAAAFI/KO59L1-LP1w/s320/cigarettes.jpg


Characterizing cannabis as medicine rather than the addictive toxic drug it is recalls efforts to promote beer to nursing mothers or even market cigarettes themselves as cough-suppressants. Live and let live, but meanwhile let's not kid ourselves -- or others -- about the health impact of such lifestyle choices. It's time to clear the smoke.

UPDATE: After reading your comments I will respond to one of the common challenges posed when it comes to this reefer debate. Now, I understand that the commonness of common sense is too quaint and obsolete for the colorful, mind-expanding world dope-heads of all ages live in, but please bear with my black and white question.
Advertisement

Related:

HEALTH CARE


For those who argue that dope (smoked or eaten) is safer or just as dangerous as alcohol, here's my question: Would you rather have a commercial pilot flying your family across country smoke a joint (or, how about simply taking one toke) or drink a glass of wine before they got in the cockpit?

That is all. Back to your peaceful bong circle. No worries.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement