Kamala Harris’ Reaction to the Now-Dead Hamas Ceasefire Deal Was Summed Up in...
Here's An IDF Officer Warning a Palestinian Civilian to Evacuate. The Call Is...
A Quick, Telling Little Internet Search
Proof of a Journalist Calling Politics Religion, and You Are Horrible for Laughing...
Sick Jews
Republicans Have a Chance to Fight Back Against Biden’s War on Small Business
The Right Sort of Nostalgia Makes Democracy Work Better
The Powerless Church
Jewish Students Are Facing Threats to Their Existence. Will We Stand By Them?
A Jewish Primer
The Hope and Hopelessness of Holocaust Memorial Day
As Jewish Heritage Month Begins, Let's Recognize Donald Trump's Achievements
Pro-Hamas Protests on College Campuses Are Getting Worse
Here's How Israel Plans to Take Rafah
Karine Jean-Pierre STILL Lacking in Responses on Pro-Hamas Protests
Tipsheet

If You Argue Pro-Choice, This Story Will Make You Stop and Think

My coworker Katie Pavlich pointed out this story on Fox News: A baby who may be the "youngest surviving premature baby in the world," born at 21 weeks, was just allowed to go home Thursday:
Advertisement


"She was not initially expected to survive, as experts generally believe that babies born before the 22nd week of pregnancy will not live. Pregnancies usually last 40 weeks."

According to scientific standards, this child should should still be in the womb, yet, as Katie observed in our discussion, she's clearly a person, and being inside or outside the womb shouldn't make a difference in that fact. Yet our current law does and declares these lives free to be taken at the mother's convenience. No other part of our law says an innocent person should lose his or her life simply because it inconveniences someone else. So much for a person's right to life.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement