Is the New Supreme Leader Already Dead?
Stelter Hung Out to Dry a Second Time This week – Says Network...
Progressive Crackpots Vs. Environmental Wackos
The Morality of Taxation
Healthcare Is Not a Right, Nor Should the Government Guarantee It
The Road to Tehran Runs Through Baku
The Parent-Led Rebellion Against EdTech
It’s Time to Build America With U.S.-Made Materials
DEI Is Dead. Corporate America Just Hasn’t Admitted It Yet.
Affordability Is Not a Slogan. Democrats Treat It Like One.
From Panic to Therapy: Cycle of Faux Climate Fear
President Donald J. Trump Can Index Capital Gains With Pen
The Unbearable Lightness of Being Gavin Newsom
The First Time in my Life That I Have Come into Conflict With...
Temple Israel Terrorist Died of Self-Inflicted Wound, Stuffed Truck With Accelerant and Fi...
Tipsheet

Tim Scott Accused of Being a Civil Rights 'Fraud' After Judicial Vote

Tim Scott Accused of Being a Civil Rights 'Fraud' After Judicial Vote

Sen. Tim Scott (R-SC) voted for Thomas Farr, nominee for the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina on Wednesday in what was one of the most controversial nominations in Congress to date. His "yes" made it 50-50, leaving Vice President Mike Pence to break the tie and vote to advance his nomination. Civil rights groups opposed Farr's nomination because he reportedly led voter suppression efforts in North Carolina, which resulted in black disenfranchisement.

Advertisement

Here's how tense of an environment it was.

Critics charge that Scott should know better than to support Farr, especially after he decided to vote against Ryan Bounds, a nominee for the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, because of his former racially insensitive writings.

As the only black Republican senator, Scott faced enormous pressure ahead of the vote. According to some, he made the wrong decision. Washington Post contributor Jennifer Rubin even called him a fraud.

In 2013, Farr was hired to defend a voter ID law in North Carolina that critics insisted suppressed minority votes. He insists he had nothing to do with the crafting of that law.

Advertisement

Related:

TIM SCOTT

"It is unconscionable that the Senate would even consider someone with Thomas Farr’s record,” according to Sherrilyn Ifill of the NAACP Legal Defense Fund.

Editor's Note: An earlier version of this piece read that Thomas Farr had been confirmed to serve as a district court judge in North Carolina. In fact, Wednesday's vote was to advance his nomination. The next vote on Farr was scheduled was Thursday, but has been postponed.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement