The NRCC Has Raised a Ton of Cash in 2026
The Replies to This Cenk Uygur Tweet About Ed Gallrein Were Brutal
Iran Threatens War 'Beyond the Region' if the US Resumes Attacks
The Rich Save What the Government Destroys
The AP Is Jealous of Pentagon Food Court Workers; LA Times Says a...
If Voter Fraud Doesn't Happen, Why Is Spanberger Blocking Feds From Polling Places?
A Book About the Threats to the Truth by AI Contains False Content...
Civil Liberties Group Sues Illinois Over FOID Requirement
A Bill Maher Guest Argued That China Has 'Freedom' It's Just a Different...
When Political Violence Becomes Acceptable, It Becomes Inevitable
Former Execs Plead Guilty to Helping Tech-Support Scammers Steal from Elderly Americans
3 Dead, 18 First Responders Quarantined After Exposure to Mystery Substance in New...
Moscow-Based Crime Ring Members Get Prison Time in $2B Healthcare Fraud Case
Doctor Allegedly Used $45M of Medicare Fraud Money on Trips, Cybertruck, and $12,000...
Michigan Woman Faces 20 Years After Pleading Guilty to $4.6M Child Modeling Scam
Tipsheet

Tim Scott Accused of Being a Civil Rights 'Fraud' After Judicial Vote

Tim Scott Accused of Being a Civil Rights 'Fraud' After Judicial Vote

Sen. Tim Scott (R-SC) voted for Thomas Farr, nominee for the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina on Wednesday in what was one of the most controversial nominations in Congress to date. His "yes" made it 50-50, leaving Vice President Mike Pence to break the tie and vote to advance his nomination. Civil rights groups opposed Farr's nomination because he reportedly led voter suppression efforts in North Carolina, which resulted in black disenfranchisement.

Advertisement

Here's how tense of an environment it was.

Critics charge that Scott should know better than to support Farr, especially after he decided to vote against Ryan Bounds, a nominee for the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, because of his former racially insensitive writings.

As the only black Republican senator, Scott faced enormous pressure ahead of the vote. According to some, he made the wrong decision. Washington Post contributor Jennifer Rubin even called him a fraud.

In 2013, Farr was hired to defend a voter ID law in North Carolina that critics insisted suppressed minority votes. He insists he had nothing to do with the crafting of that law.

Advertisement

Related:

TIM SCOTT

"It is unconscionable that the Senate would even consider someone with Thomas Farr’s record,” according to Sherrilyn Ifill of the NAACP Legal Defense Fund.

Editor's Note: An earlier version of this piece read that Thomas Farr had been confirmed to serve as a district court judge in North Carolina. In fact, Wednesday's vote was to advance his nomination. The next vote on Farr was scheduled was Thursday, but has been postponed.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement