Pre-Election Special SALE: 60% Off VIP Membership
BREAKING: Supreme Court Rules on Whether Virginia Can Remove Non-Citizens From Voter Rolls
Tim Walz's Gaming Session With Ocasio-Cortez Was a Trainwreck
Oregon Predicates Request to Judge on Self-Delusion
GDP Report Shows Economy 'Weaker Than Expected'
How Trump Plans to Help Compensate Victims of 'Migrant Crime'
NRCC Blasts the Left's Voter Suppression Efforts in Battleground Districts
Watch Trump's Reaction to Finding Out Biden Called His Supporters 'Garbage'
Scott Jennings Calls Out CNN Host, Panelists Trying to Desperately Explain Away Biden's...
There Was a Vile, Violent Attack in Chicago, and the Media's Been Silent....
One Red State Just Acquired a Massive Amount of Land to Secure Its...
Poll Out of Texas Shows That Harris Rally Sure Didn't Work for Colin...
This Hollywood Actor Is Persuading Christian Men to Vote for Kamala Harris
Is the Trump Campaign Over-Confident?
Is This Really How the Kamala HQ Is Going to Respond to Biden’s...
Tipsheet

RNC Chair Slams Politico Editor for Biased Tweet About Trump

RNC Chairwoman Ronna McDaniel has figured out why Americans' trust in media is at an all-time low. It's for tweets like this:

Advertisement

Others agreed that perhaps Harris, the editor-in-chief of Politico, should hold himself to higher journalistic standards. Tim Graham of Newsbusters reminded Harris of his own words back in 2006.

Washington Post political editor John F. Harris, yes, the one who thinks criticizing any Clinton policy today is an annoying "distraction," did the weekly Live Talk at Newsweek's website last week, and after the usual hum of liberal questions, he grew snippy at a conservative one:

Anonymous: "There is no liberal equivalent of the Fox News Channel, or Rush Limbaugh, or the Drudge Report." My question to you is what do you think CNN, The New York Times, Washington Post, etc., are--conservative mouthpieces? What makes them any better than Fox?

John F. Harris: This perception is widespread. I can understand it. But even those who think the news organizations you name are liberally biased, can not really argue that they are equivalent. There are professional standards of evidence, balance, and rhetorical restraint in Old Media that simply do not exist in New Media.

"There are professional standards of evidence, balance, and rhetorical restraint in Old Media that simply do not exist in New Media." -- John Harris, 2006. How outdated does THAT sound?" Graham asked on Twitter.

Advertisement

In 1976, Gallup found that 74 percent of Americans trusted the media. In 2016, it dropped to 32 percent. Republicans are especially skeptical, with just 14 percent believing what they hear.

Trump, of course, is not a white nationalist. Yet, critics condemned him for not placing full blame on the white nationalists who staged a rally in Charlottesville, VA last year. The march got violent and a young female counter protester was tragically killed. The president insisted "both sides" were to blame for the carnage. The president did eventually issue a much stronger statement condemning organizers of the white supremacist march. On the somber one-year anniversary, he again sounded off on "all types of racism and acts of violence" and urged "Peace to ALL Americans!" on Twitter. Yet, some media outlets have still accused the White House of embracing bigotry.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement