The Supreme Court Just Ruled on VA's Motion Over Their Redrawn Map. Meltdowns...
Texas to House the Nation's First Detransitioner Clinic
The Humanitarian Aid Machine Cannot Be Bamboozled by Gaza
A Silver Lining to Leftist Street Violence
Wes Moore Wants Four More Years. Maryland Families Should Say 'No More.'
Great Nations Aren't Destroyed by Enemies. They're Destroyed by Debt.
The Electoral College and American Freedom
The United Arab Emirates Is Playing Its Own Game
In War, There Is No Substitute for Victory
The HRC Scorecard Retreat Is Progress, but Corporations Must Stop Funding Harm to...
Global Gender Battle
The Cooks Will Finally Eat Their Own Cooking
Iraqi Terror Commander Arrested for Plotting Nearly 20 Attacks in U.S. and Europe
Lottery Scammer Pushed 73-Year-Old to Sell Her Home for a Prize That Never...
Virginia's New Gun Ban Faces Immediate Legal Challenge From Second Amendment Groups
Tipsheet

RNC Chair Slams Politico Editor for Biased Tweet About Trump

RNC Chair Slams Politico Editor for Biased Tweet About Trump

RNC Chairwoman Ronna McDaniel has figured out why Americans' trust in media is at an all-time low. It's for tweets like this:

Advertisement

Others agreed that perhaps Harris, the editor-in-chief of Politico, should hold himself to higher journalistic standards. Tim Graham of Newsbusters reminded Harris of his own words back in 2006.

Washington Post political editor John F. Harris, yes, the one who thinks criticizing any Clinton policy today is an annoying "distraction," did the weekly Live Talk at Newsweek's website last week, and after the usual hum of liberal questions, he grew snippy at a conservative one:

Anonymous: "There is no liberal equivalent of the Fox News Channel, or Rush Limbaugh, or the Drudge Report." My question to you is what do you think CNN, The New York Times, Washington Post, etc., are--conservative mouthpieces? What makes them any better than Fox?

John F. Harris: This perception is widespread. I can understand it. But even those who think the news organizations you name are liberally biased, can not really argue that they are equivalent. There are professional standards of evidence, balance, and rhetorical restraint in Old Media that simply do not exist in New Media.

"There are professional standards of evidence, balance, and rhetorical restraint in Old Media that simply do not exist in New Media." -- John Harris, 2006. How outdated does THAT sound?" Graham asked on Twitter.

Advertisement

In 1976, Gallup found that 74 percent of Americans trusted the media. In 2016, it dropped to 32 percent. Republicans are especially skeptical, with just 14 percent believing what they hear.

Trump, of course, is not a white nationalist. Yet, critics condemned him for not placing full blame on the white nationalists who staged a rally in Charlottesville, VA last year. The march got violent and a young female counter protester was tragically killed. The president insisted "both sides" were to blame for the carnage. The president did eventually issue a much stronger statement condemning organizers of the white supremacist march. On the somber one-year anniversary, he again sounded off on "all types of racism and acts of violence" and urged "Peace to ALL Americans!" on Twitter. Yet, some media outlets have still accused the White House of embracing bigotry.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos