This Reporter Suffered a Total Meltdown Over a Top VA Dem Having Her...
MS NOW: The FBI Can’t Investigate Illegal Leaks
The Crazy New TikTok Trend That Terrifies Church of Scientology
This City Just Banned Meat From Advertisements
Kash Patel Says FBI Lied to Obtain Warrant to Spy on 2016 Trump...
Sam Stein Is Bothered by the Louise Lucas Raid But Unbothered by the...
Rampant Antisemitism Is a Feature, Not a Bug, of Mamdani's Administration
So Much for 'Diversity:' University of Toronto Turned Communal Prayer Room Into Muslim-Onl...
Dem House Hopeful Attacks Iowans After Backlash to Muslim Prayer Controversy in State...
What Makes an American, American? Justice Gorsuch Reminds Us of the Answer
Steve Hilton Confronts Xavier Becerra Over Campaign Fund Scandal As Staffers Face Prison...
To Katie Porter CA Fraud Is Just 'Political Theater'
Medicaid Millionaires Are Hiding in Plain Sight
Florida Arrest Exposes $2.8M Food Aid Scam Built on Stolen Grocery Store Identities
Two Men Sentenced in $522 Million Medicare Fraud Scheme Involving Genetic Tests
Tipsheet

Feinstein: I'm Concerned that Gorsuch Is an 'Originalist'

Feinstein: I'm Concerned that Gorsuch Is an 'Originalist'

Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) offered her interpretation of the Constitution at Monday’s Senate Judiciary Committee hearing for Trump’s nominee to the Supreme Court, Neil Gorsuch. In her opening remarks, the Democratic senator said she was deeply troubled by the nominee’s identifying himself as a constitutional “originalist.”

Advertisement

Feinstein began by noting she was “deeply disappointed” that Obama’s choice for the Supreme Court, Merrick Garland, did not get the luxury of a hearing. Nevertheless, she said it is now the committee’s job to determine whether Gorsuch is a “reasonable mainstream conservative” fit for the highest court in the land.

She did not seem to have much confidence in the nominee. Feinstein is disturbed by Gorsuch’s originalism, she argued, because she believes the concept “ignores the intent of the framers.”

“It’s a framework on which to build,” she said. “I firmly believe the Constitution is a living document that evolves as our country evolves.”

Feinstein noted that at the time of the document’s initial drafting, slavery was still an institution and women were still being burned at the stake for witchcraft. If the document had not evolved with culture, she added, we would still have segregated schools and women wouldn’t be equally protected under the law.

Feinstein also voiced her concern as to how Gorsuch would rule on issues dealing with the environment, health care, billionaires and large corporations and their influence on elections, gun rights, and women’s reproductive rights. Roe v. Wade and women’s right to privacy “is not theoretical,” she insisted.

Advertisement

The good news is Gorsuch was fully prepared for these talking points. Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA) told him not to “worry” about such recycled attacks in his opening statement.

In his own remarks, Sen. Mike Lee (R-UT) reminded Feinstein that in liberal justice Elena Kagan's confirmation hearing for the Supreme Court in 2010, even she said "we are all originalists."

This post has been updated.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos