Mike Johnson Torches Pope Over Feud With Trump
Trump May Have Delivered a Crushing Blow to the Iranian Regime
What Democrats Are Trying to Do to Pete Hegseth Shows How Unserious They...
Omaha Police Shoot Knife-Wielding Woman and It Wasn't Her First Run in With...
Leftists Mobs Violently Attacked a TPUSA Journalist. Will They Face Justice?
The 'Universal Healthcare' Democrats Want Is a Death Sentence
Why Is the Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction Hiding Public School Spending Data?
A 'British National' Murdered Two Women, Including a DHS Employee, in Georgia
Tom Homan Has the Perfect Response for Catholic Leaders Complaining About Immigration Enfo...
Trump’s Not Wrong on the Euros
This Is What Passes for an Intelligent Gun Control Argument These Days
This Democrat Says He Is 'Disgusted' After Having Eric Swalwell on His Show
Inside NATO’s Contingency Plan for a US Exit From the Alliance, and Why...
Hasan Piker: 'The Fall of the USSR Was One of the Greatest Catastrophes...
A Top Democrat in California's Governor Race Just Vowed to Take the Most...
Tipsheet

Feinstein: I'm Concerned that Gorsuch Is an 'Originalist'

Feinstein: I'm Concerned that Gorsuch Is an 'Originalist'

Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) offered her interpretation of the Constitution at Monday’s Senate Judiciary Committee hearing for Trump’s nominee to the Supreme Court, Neil Gorsuch. In her opening remarks, the Democratic senator said she was deeply troubled by the nominee’s identifying himself as a constitutional “originalist.”

Advertisement

Feinstein began by noting she was “deeply disappointed” that Obama’s choice for the Supreme Court, Merrick Garland, did not get the luxury of a hearing. Nevertheless, she said it is now the committee’s job to determine whether Gorsuch is a “reasonable mainstream conservative” fit for the highest court in the land.

She did not seem to have much confidence in the nominee. Feinstein is disturbed by Gorsuch’s originalism, she argued, because she believes the concept “ignores the intent of the framers.”

“It’s a framework on which to build,” she said. “I firmly believe the Constitution is a living document that evolves as our country evolves.”

Feinstein noted that at the time of the document’s initial drafting, slavery was still an institution and women were still being burned at the stake for witchcraft. If the document had not evolved with culture, she added, we would still have segregated schools and women wouldn’t be equally protected under the law.

Feinstein also voiced her concern as to how Gorsuch would rule on issues dealing with the environment, health care, billionaires and large corporations and their influence on elections, gun rights, and women’s reproductive rights. Roe v. Wade and women’s right to privacy “is not theoretical,” she insisted.

Advertisement

The good news is Gorsuch was fully prepared for these talking points. Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA) told him not to “worry” about such recycled attacks in his opening statement.

In his own remarks, Sen. Mike Lee (R-UT) reminded Feinstein that in liberal justice Elena Kagan's confirmation hearing for the Supreme Court in 2010, even she said "we are all originalists."

This post has been updated.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement