Why Was Clarence Thomas the Lone Dissenter in a Recent Second Amendment Ruling?
UPDATE: Biden Finally Releases Statement on Terrorist Mob That Attacked LA Synagogue
CNN Host Gets Roasted for Her Explanation for Why She Cut Off a...
Is This Why There's Going to Be a Game Seven in the Stanley...
Trump Has a Chance
New Pentagon Chief of Staff Slammed As 'Unqualified' and Not 'Trustworthy'
Former White House Physician to Biden: Submit to a Drug Test Before the...
Six Years After This Climate 'Prophet' Said Arctic Ice Would Be Gone, It's...
New Yorkers Aren't Such Big Fans of Hochul These Days
'Pushing Us Into World War III': Russia Blames US for Deadly Ukrainian Missile...
TikTok Bans Sports Apparel Company From Advertising on Platform. It's Not Hard to...
A ‘Trans’ Athlete Robbed Women of a Women's NCAA Title. Here’s What He...
Five Illegal Aliens Charged With Kidnapping 14-Year-Old Girl
Will Congress Take Internet Safety Seriously?
The Supreme Court Will Review a Ban on So-Called ‘Gender-Affirming’ Care for Kids

Why Is Hal Rogers Caving To Obama On Executive Amnesty?

“I am not on the ballot this fall," President Obama said in his prepared remarks at Northwestern University on October 2nd. But my "policies are on the ballot," Obama continued. "Every single one of them.”


Obama's Democratic party was then crushed at the polls a month later, losing a net 8 (soon to be 9) Senate seats, at least 12 House seats, as well as three governorships.

Obama's executive amnesty for illegal immigrants even received a direct rebuke in the deep blue state of Oregon where voters rejected a ballot initiative that would have given illegal immigrants drivers licenses. Obama's amnesty would overturn the will of these voters by forcing states to give illegal immigrants drivers licenses

Despite this overwhelming rejection of Obama's policies generally, and his executive amnesty specifically, House Appropriations Chairman Hal Rogers (R-KY) is determined to rubber stamp Obama's lawlessness by passing a long-term government funding bill. The Wall Street Journal reports:

GOP leaders made clear in the days after the election that they wanted to set their own agenda when they control of both chambers next year without any lingering fights about spending for the current fiscal year. The leaders also want to look for other ways to push back against the president’s moves on immigration, said a senior Senate GOP aide.

House Appropriations Committee Chairman Hal Rogers (R., Ky.) said it would be unrealistic to expect the president would sign a spending bill that included the immigration language.

“I don’t want a shutdown,” he said. “You should not take a hostage that you can’t shoot.”


Three thoughts:

1) Obama is the hostage taker here. Obama said his policies were on the ballot and then his policies got crushed at the ballot box by the American people. All Congress has to do is pass a spending bill that keeps everything else up and running but also forbids Obama from spending any funds on work permits and other documents for illegal immigrants. Then let Obama shutdown the federal government over his own unprecedented abuse of executive power.

2) There is no other way but the power of the purse to check Obama's lawless abuse of executive power. Impeachment would be overkill and would drown out any other GOP agenda items far worse than an appropriations battle would. And Speaker John Boehner's (R-OH) lawsuit has proved to be such a bad joke it hasn't even been filed yet.

3) The GOP will not have any agenda if they cave to Obama on amnesty. This is not the only issue where Obama wants to use executive power to get around Congress. On Iran, Obamacare, energy, education, internet regulation, etc., Obama wants to act as if Congress does not exist. If Republicans cave on amnesty because they are afraid of being blamed for a shutdown, then Obama will see it as a green light to walk all over them on everything.


Now if House Republicans want to pass a short-term funding bill now, one that funds the government through till January, so that they can then fight Obama alongside a Republican Senate, that makes some sense.

But to pass a year-long funding bill and forfeit all leverage over Obama on this issue would be a gut punching betrayal for Republican voters. It just makes no sense.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member


Trending on Townhall Videos