Jamie Raskin's Low Opinion of Women
Thank You, GOD!
A Quick Bible Study Vol. 306: ‘Fear Not' Old Testament – Part 2
The War on Warring
Federal Judge Sentences Abilene Drug Trafficker to Life for Fentanyl Distribution
Jeffries Calls Citizenship Proof ‘Voter Suppression’ as Majority of Americans Back Voter I...
Four Reasons Why the Washington Post Is Dying
Foreign-Born Ohio Lawmaker Pushes 'Sensitive Locations' Bill to Limit ICE Enforcement
TrumpRx Triggers TDS in Elizabeth Warren
Texas Democrat Goes Viral After Pitting Whites Against Minorities
U.S. Secret Service Seized 3 Card Skimmers in Alabama, Stopping $3.1M in Fraud
Jasmine Crockett Finally Added Some Policy to Her Website and It Was a...
No Sanctuary in the Sanctuary
Chromosomes Matter — and Women’s Sports Prove It
The Economy Will Decide Congress — If Republicans Actually Talk About It
Tipsheet

4.5 Million Jobs? Not So Fast!

Throughout last night speeches at the DNC, repeatedly we heard something approaching a ritual incantation: Obama has created 4.5 million new jobs.

Well, not so fast.  As a CNN fact check points out this morning, there are FEWER jobs in America than when Barack Obama took office in January 2009.  The 4.5 million number holds true only if you compare current employment levels to January 2010 -- the bottom of the employment market, when Obama had already been in office for a year.  Actually, there are only something like 300,000 more jobs now than in January of 2009 -- not even enough to keep up with employment growth (http://www.cnn.com/2012/09/05/politics/fact-check-obama-jobs/index.html?hpt=hp_c1).

Advertisement

So judging from the way the President and his backers are touting the number, if his policies had created massive job losses (say, 12 million) but 10 million of those jobs came back, he could take credit for creating 10 million jobs -- even though, hypothetically, there would be 2 million fewer jobs than there were before his term in office.  Convenient, no?

Incidentally, let's hope the fact checkers listen and learn: THIS is how one conducts a fact check.  It doesn't rely on impressions, understandings or other subjective tricks intended to transform a statement the "fact checker" doesn't like into a "lie."  It is a clear, concise statement of objective facts backed by hard numbers or other indisputable data.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement