The Law Firm That Laundered the Russia Hoax Has Been Stripped of Security...
Trump Gives New Instructions to DOGE
Do We Have an Amy Coney Barrett Problem?
Justice Department Launches Investigation Into University of California Over Antisemitism...
Seriously, the Fact-Checkers Should Just Take the Rest of the Month Off...
Scott Jennings Once More Issues a Key Reminder About 80/20 Issue of Trans...
Office of Civil Rights Goes After Maine for Ignoring Trump’s Order on Women’s...
State Department to Revoke Visas of Pro-Hamas Agitators Here on Student Visas
Trump Has Some Thoughts About Cruel Remarks From Rachel Maddow, Nicolle Wallace on...
Billions Given to Months-Old Charities by $375B EPA Slush Fund
Jasmine Crockett Outdoes Herself Yet Again, Claims Trump Wants to Send Black People...
Democrats Sure Are in Disarray Over the Theatrics From Tuesday Night
Study Reveals This Disturbing Truth About Sex Reassignment Surgery
As Speaker Johnson, Other Republicans React to Dems' Chaos Over Censuring Al Green,...
Trump's Best Line of Tuesday's Speech Exposed Dems' Garbage Spin on the Border...
Tipsheet

Hardly a Surprise

Today, the Washington Post reports, in effect, that Sonia Sotomayor doesn't seem either to grasp or else to honor by the distinction between a trial judge and an appellate one
Advertisement
.

Can anyone truly be surprised?  Sotomayor is "empathetic" -- she doesn't understand that a judge's role isn't to make policy; it's to interpet the law.  If she's willing to ignore a judge's role altogether, why would she bother abiding by the traditional understanding of the different roles of a trial and appellate judge?

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement