How You Know This Major Newspaper Doesn't Feel Good About Kamala
Latest Poll of Young Black and Latino Male Voters Has to Embarrass Dems
Kamala's Insane Talking Points
Jake Tapper Demeans Gold Star Family, and the Press Attempts Another Failed October...
Donald Trump, Class Traitor Par Excellence
Conservation Is on the Ballot in Three States This Year
CNN's Town Hall Leans into Boosting Kamala
The Democratic Party's Bad October
Kamala Is the Bigger Threat to the Constitutional Order
Democrats Attack Free Speech—Again
America’s International Decline Can No Longer Be Ignored
Trump's Rosebud 2024: An Insurrection or a Resurrection?
Mysterious CCP Supply Chains are Cause for Concern
Wall Street Places Its Bet on Trump, and We Couldn't Agree More
Kamala Opposed Anti-Gang Measure That Californians Overwhelmingly Supported
Tipsheet

How 'Bout Some Transparency?

Discussing the Obama campaign's hiring of Linda Douglass over at NRO's Campaign Spot, Jim Geraghty notes that "Next time a critic complains, 'those reporters are writing like they want a job with the candidate' . . . it may not be hyperbole."
 
Advertisement
He's right.  Of course, it's to be expected that some reporters may want, seek or accept jobs with a particular campaign.  So let's have some transparency.

It's only fair for the public to be informed about which journalists are seeking or being considered for jobs with the campaigns.  It's a piece of information that people need to be able to take into account when they are consuming those journalists' work product.

It doesn't undermine anyone's "journalistic credibility" for them to disclose an interest in joining a campaign.  In my view, it enhances it -- because they have enough respect for their public to be straightforward, and enough confidence in their own fairness that they're willing to allow their work to be scrutinized in light of that information.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement