What VA Dems Are Doing Following Their Brutal Redistricting Defeat Will Leave You...
Remember When Hakeem Jeffries Said This About Redistricting? He Just Ate Those Words
Did Anyone Notice What Was Funny With This VA Dem Senator's Take on...
NBC News Said What About Kyle Rittenhouse?!
Watch a CNN Host Lose It Over the Virginia Supreme Court Trashing the...
Parents Should Protect Their Children, Not Encourage Delusions
High Honors for the Left, Crickets for the Right
DOJ Sues New Mexico and Albuquerque Over Laws Blocking Federal Immigration Enforcement
Abby Phillip Is Raging About the GOP's Redistricting Wins
Wait, That's Who Democrats Are Bringing Out to Flip Texas?
Sacrifice for the Cause
Coal Has Evolved. America Should Compete.
Applying 'Peace Through Strength' to Affordability: A Key to President Trump’s Wider Agend...
Reconciling America
Could Evil Netflix Still Devour Warner Bros.? Stranger Things...Has Happened!
Tipsheet

Grassley Argues The Whistleblower Should Be 'Heard Out And Protected'

Grassley Argues The Whistleblower Should Be 'Heard Out And Protected'
AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais

President Donald Trump has said he believes he should have the opportunity to confront the anonymous whistleblower who came forward about Trump's July call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. During the call, Trump asked Zelensky to investigate potential corruption between then-Vice President Joe Biden and his son, Hunter's, connection to a Ukrainian gas company. Biden threatened to fire a prosecutor who was investigating the gas company which Hunter sat on the board of directors of.

Advertisement

Former Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-IA), however, believes the whistleblower should be "heard out and protected."

“This person appears to have followed the whistleblower protection laws and ought to be heard out and protected. We should always work to respect whistleblowers’ requests for confidentiality. Any further media reports on the whistleblower’s identity don’t serve the public interest—even if the conflict sells more papers or attracts clicks," Grassley said in a statement.

“No one should be making judgments or pronouncements without hearing from the whistleblower first and carefully following up on the facts. Uninformed speculation wielded by politicians or media commentators as a partisan weapon is counterproductive and doesn’t serve the country," he explained.

According to the senator, it doesn't matter whether or not the whistleblower's information came second or third-hand; he still deserves to be protected.

“When it comes to whether someone qualifies as a whistleblower, the distinctions being drawn between first- and second-hand knowledge aren’t legal ones. It’s just not part of whistleblower protection law or any agency policy," the senator said. "Complaints based on second-hand information should not be rejected out of hand, but they do require additional leg work to get at the facts and evaluate the claim’s credibility."

Advertisement

Grassley is Chair of the Senate Whistleblower Protection Caucus. He has been responsible for many of the laws that protect whistleblowers.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement