BIDEN DROPOUT SALE: 60% Off VIP Membership - LAST CHANCE!
FBI Director Again Warns the Open Southern Border Is a Major Threat
Democrats Seem Pretty Nervous About Kamala Losing Her War Chest
Terrorist Protesters Storm Union Station in DC and Burn American Flags
Netanyahu Destroys Terrorist Sympathizers in the U.S. in Speech to Congress
Would-Be Trump Assassin Googled Kennedy Assassination Details Before Attack
Here's What BLM Had to Say About Kamala Harris Essentially Becoming the Dem...
Kamala’s Revisionism in Play - Look How the Press Is Rewriting Their Own...
Rashida Tlaib Had to be Reprimanded for Her Protest of Netanyahu's Speech
Here's Where Illegal Immigrants Crossing the Northern Border Are Headed
Three Universities in This State Closed Their DEI Offices
A Prominent 'Journalist' and the DNC Chair Just Joined Forces on a Despicable...
Here’s Florida’s Latest Initiative to Promote School Choice
Axios Shredded for Lie About Kamala Harris' Role As Border Czar
Here's Why Nikki Haley Sent a Cease and Desist Letter to a Kamala...
Tipsheet

The Boston Marathon Bomber's Lawyers Have Quite The Request

The attorneys for Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, the Boston Marathon Bomber, on Thursday filed a brief with the United States Court of Appeals asking for the death penalty to be taken off the table.

Advertisement

In the 500-page appeal, Tsarnaev's attorneys argued that their client did not receive a fair trial because it took place in Boston as the city was recovering from the heart wrenching attacks. Lawyers also said there were "issues with jurors, certain testimony from surviving victims and the defense’s inability to tell jurors about links between Tsarnaev’s brother and an unsolved triple killing in 2011," the Associated Press reported. 

The attorney's primary focus, however, is on the fact that the trial took place in Boston, despite their best efforts to get it moved to another location. They believe the jury pool was tainted because of the number of people impacted by the bombings and the intense media scrutiny. 

“Forcing this case to trial in a venue still suffering from the bombings was the District Court’s first fundamental error, and it deprived Tsarnaev of an impartial jury and a reliable verdict, in violation of the Fifth, Sixth, and Eighth Amendments,” the brief states.

"Among other things, the public defenders accuse Tsarnaev’s jury forewoman, a restaurant manager his attorneys tried to get removed, of retweeting a social media post calling the University of Massachusetts Dartmouth sophomore a 'piece of garbage'  before she received a juror summons, but that she claimed during questioning for her suitability to serve she had not commented on this case,'" The Boston Herald reported. "A second juror, a male municipal worker, outright “disobeyed the Court’s instructions,” the brief asserts, by joining a Facebook discussion about the case before he was seated."

Advertisement

According to the brief, attorneys believe Tsarnaev should serve in prison without the possibility of parole. 

“Tsarnaev admitted heinous crimes but even so — perhaps especially so — this trial demanded scrupulous adherence to the requirements of the Constitution and federal law. Again and again this trial fell short," his lawyers argued.

Tsarnaev was convicted of 30 charges, including use of a weapon of mass destruction and conspiring to detonate a bomb in a public place, both resulting in death back in April 2015. He was sentenced to the death penalty as a result.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement