Jen Psaki's Faux Platner Outrage
More Platner Grappling in the Press; An ICE Shooting Has the Bulwark Gang...
Democrats Unanimously Opposed the Working Families Tax Cuts. Now They're Trying to Take...
250 Years After Independence, New Index Asks Whether Government Is Stifling America's Char...
How Low Can She Go? As Prosecutors Lay Out Case Against Tyler Robinson,...
Here's the Problem With Modern-Day Immigration, According to Milton Friedman
It's Not Just Democrats Who Have Lost Faith in the Free Market
NH Casino Owner Pleads Guilty to Stealing $255K in COVID-19 Relief Funds
Boston Accounting Firm Owner Sentenced in $1.6 Million Under-the-Table Pay Scheme
The United States Is Still Talking to Iran After Big Strikes
West Virginia Woman Pleads Guilty to Stealing $160K From Disabled Veteran
This Canadian Woman Just Exposed the Fatal Flaws of Universal Healthcare
Boston Store Owner Sentenced After $7 Million SNAP Fraud Scheme
Susan Collins Already Defeated One of Her Possible Democrat Challengers
Talarico Has Another Tenet of His Fake Christianity
Tipsheet

What Obama Won't Say Tonight

What Obama Won't Say Tonight
The Washington Post reports that the President will not embrace his own deficit commission's recommendations to reform Social Security during his State of the Union Address this evening, presumably because he sees it as (1) a potential political vulnerability, (2) a threat to the Left's treasured dependency society, or (3) a bit of both.  Trying to do the right thing the hard way on a desperately needed Social Security overhaul didn't
Advertisement
work out too well for his predecessor, so Obama is content to sit pat and stay mum on the subject.  Leadership:

President Obama has decided not to endorse his deficit commission's recommendation to raise the retirement age, and otherwise reduce Social Security benefits, in Tuesday's State of the Union address, cheering liberals and drawing a stark line between the White House and key Republicans in Congress.

Over the weekend, the White House informed Democratic lawmakers and advocates for seniors that Obama will emphasize the need to reduce record deficits in the speech, but that he will not call for reducing spending on Social Security - the single largest federal program - as part of that effort.

Liberals, who have been alarmed by Obama's recent to shift to the center and his effort to court the nation's business community, applauded the decision, arguing that Social Security cuts are neither necessary to reduce current deficits nor a wise move politically.

Sure, it may be an unwise political move right now (Americans from across the spectrum oppose Social Security cuts), but like it or not, those cuts are
Advertisement
surely coming -- and sooner than we'd like to think.  If only we had a president who would proudly and courageously assure voters that when it comes to issues requiring leadership and responsibility, he'd rather be "a really good one-term president than a mediocre two-term president."  Such a bold, principled leader would undoubtedly stand up to his political base and imperil his own electoral fortunes in the name of undertaking the difficult task of addressing a looming crisis.  Either that, or he'd be (once again) exposed as being all talk.

(h/t Allahpundit)

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement