There's an Update on the Kind of Classified Information Biden Mishandled
NPR Editor Who Got Suspended for Ripping Publication Over Liberal Bias Resigns
Whistleblower Alleges Biden Is Endangering American Forces in Niger
BREAKING: Senate Dems Torpedo Mayorkas Impeachment
Math Is Hard for WNBA Fans
‘Our Constitution Was Made Only for a Moral and Religious People,’ Part II
MSNBC Host Makes Trump Prosecution About Racial Diversity
Wait Until You Hear What One of the Prospective 'Unbiased' Trump Trial Jurors...
Netanyahu's 9-Word Warning to Terrorist-Backed Iran
Columbia University President Responds to Claims of Anti-Semitism on Campus
House Has 'Sole Power of Impeachment': Comer Issues Key Reminder to WH Over...
Law Enforcement Officials Reveal How Biden’s Policies Enable Criminal Illegal Aliens
Biden's Speech in Scranton Was Full of Some Pretty Bad Moments
Thank you, John Sterling
More Than 100 Illegal Aliens Cut Through Wire Installed by National Guard to...

Manufacturing a Crime

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of

In December, I was asked to file a second report on an automobile accident that took place back in September, during a visit to Los Angeles. A truck slammed into my car from behind while I was stopped at a traffic light.


As I sat down to write a new report, I tried to recall the details, beginning with where the accident took place, which I remembered as having been on Wilshire Boulevard.

Fortunately, I had saved a copy of my first report on this same accident, which showed that it took place on Santa Monica Boulevard, not Wilshire, which was the street up ahead.

What if I had not saved a copy of that first report, and had written down and signed a report saying that the accident took place on Wilshire Boulevard, when everyone else involved said it was on Santa Monica Boulevard? If this was a statement made under oath, I could have been prosecuted for perjury.

All this made me think back to a more important case where memories differed and a man's life was ruined because of a perjury conviction. Moreover, it was about something that was no more crucial than the name of the street where an accident took place.

That man was Lewis ("Scooter") Libby, assistant to Vice-President Dick Cheney. He testified under oath that he had not leaked to reporters the information that Valerie Plame worked for the CIA, but had in fact learned about it himself from reporters, including Tim Russert.

Unfortunately for Scooter Libby, there was testimony from Tim Russert that he himself did not know that Valerie Plame worked for the CIA at the time of his conversation with Libby. Perhaps even more damaging, the White House's own press secretary, Ari Fleischer, said that Libby mentioned to him that Ms. Plame worked for the CIA. This was a few days before Libby talked with Russert.


It seems clear that Libby had his facts wrong.

But in more than 8 months between the various conversations at issue and Scooter Libby's testimony before a grand jury, those facts assumed a far greater importance than they had at the time, when there was no reason for them to be particularly memorable.

While it is a crime to reveal the identity of an undercover CIA agent, Valerie Plame was no longer an undercover agent, her identity having already been revealed long before this whole episode. She was now just someone with a desk job at CIA headquarters in Virginia when this furor broke out.

The only reason her name appeared in the media was that her husband, former ambassador Joseph Wilson, had attacked the Bush administration for going to war in Iraq. Wilson had gone to the African nation of Niger to check out suspicions that Saddam Hussein was seeking uranium from there, in order to create weapons of mass destruction. He concluded that this was not so.

Wilson became an instant hero to critics of the Iraq war in the mainstream media. The impression was widespread that the Bush administration-- specifically Vice-President Dick Cheney-- had sent him to Niger and then rejected his report.

This was news to officials of the Bush administration, who scrambled to find out who this man was and who sent him to Niger. Among those scrambling to find out was Scooter Libby.

What Libby and others discovered was that Wilson had been sent by the CIA, on the recommendation of his wife, Valerie Plame. When this was revealed in a column by Robert Novak on July 14, 2003, a clamor went up that a CIA agent had been "outed" in retaliation for her husband's criticism of the administration.


In reality, Robert Novak got his information from Richard Armitage, not Scooter Libby. Moreover, Novak was a critic of the Bush administration's decision to go to war in Iraq, so he was very unlikely to be part of a plot to retaliate against Wilson.

Neither Novak nor Armitage nor anybody else was prosecuted for revealing Valerie Plame's name, for it was no crime. But Scooter Libby was prosecuted big time for getting his facts wrong.

As someone who has any number of times had his memory corrected by consulting old records or old letters, I don't think a man's life should be ruined for that, when there was no crime to investigate in the first place.

Surely President Bush can pardon this man before leaving office.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member


Trending on Townhall Videos