How DOJ Staffers Reacted to Matt Gaetz's Nomination as Attorney General
Is This Why Trump Rolled Out a Ton of Controversial Picks?
Trump Makes His Choice for White House Press Secretary
The Ratings Continue to Fall Down an Elevator Shaft as the Networks Continue...
NSSF Makes the Right Request on Office of Gun Violence Prevention
Staying on Top May Be Harder Than Getting There in the First Place
Third-Party-Payers Might Be the Real Financial Catastrophe
Will President-elect Trump Deliver on His 11-Point Education Plan?
A Whistleblower's Warning: RFK Jr. Must Address the Missing Migrant Children Crisis at...
Democrats Defend Soviet-Era ‘Myth of Infallibility’
Remembering Corrie ten Boom and the Jews
Trump's Iran Strategy Could End Middle East Wars
Human Smugglers Told to Rush to the Border Before Trump Takes Office
John Brennan’s Criticism of Tulsi Gabbard Contradicts His Own Past
Ridiculous Democrat Calls for 'Shadow Government' to Undermine Trump's Agenda
OPINION

China and South Korea Corruption: The Globalists’ Globe Isn’t a Very Nice Place

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

I am a virulent free trader. I love commerce between nigh any peoples and nations with whom the exchanges are on equal footing - and as unfettered as possible by government intervention and imposition.

Advertisement

The problems arise when we venture out into a world full of countries in love with government intervention and imposition. 

Every nation on the planet has the inherent desire to tilt the commercial scales in their favor. I fully understand the aspiration - but we should demand it never become commercial policy. 

Unfortunately, we have spent the last half century or so allowing the world’s nations to do exactly that. Very much to our national detriment. 

In no small part because - from all appearances - the United States’ Establishment does not share the rest of the world’s inherent desire to make our nation better.

The US Establishment has for decades allowed access to our world’s-largest-economy - virtually free from government imposition. While time and again allowing nigh every other nation to impose all sorts of government limits, taxes and other inflictions upon our goods and services entering their markets. 

Additionally, the US Establishment has stood idly by while the world’s nations engaged in all sorts of domestic-cronyism-abuse of our companies and their products. 

To wit: China, South Korea - and our intellectual property.

Advertisement

China Fines Qualcomm Record $975M in Anti-Monopoly Case

China’s anti-monopoly case against Qualcomm was because Qualcomm own patents. Which is a lawless assault on Qualcomm and its intellectual property. 

Patents are issued with the expressed intention of their granting their holders exclusive use of that which is patented. 

To then charge a patent holder under antitrust monopoly law is an egregious abuse of power and decidedly obnoxious. 

China did this in part because it is a Communist government, and Communists aren’t very nice. And they’ll certainly very much enjoy spending Qualcomm’s $1 billion.

But they also did it for a homegrown crony reason. 

Once a Treasured Qualcomm Customer, Huawei Is Now Its Biggest Threat: “There will be a technology cold war between the US and China - and also between Qualcomm and Huawei.”

And Huawei is…a Chinese company. So the Chinese government attacking Qualcomm helps Huawei. 

But again, China is Communist - with all the nastiness that entails. Certainly a free nation like South Korea wouldn’t do anything remotely like what China did.

Advertisement

Qualcomm Faces $853 Million Fine From South Korea Over Alleged Antitrust Violations

Oops - South Korea has done exactly what China has done. For exactly the same reason.

Competition Between Qualcomm And Samsung Heats Up

Samsung is…you guessed it - a South Korean company. So South Korea’s government attacking Qualcomm helps Samsung.

Even still, this is a pretty corrupt way of doing business. How very China of them. This should surprise us in South Korea, no?

Ex-South Korean President Indicted for Corruption: “South Korean prosecutors on Monday indicted former President Lee Myung-bak with 16 counts on a number of corruption charges, which also includes taking bribes.

“Lee has been in pre-trial detention since he was arrested last month on charges of bribery, embezzlement, abuse of power and other irregularities.

“The former South Korean president is accused of taking bribes amounting to 11.1 billion won, which also includes 700 million won from the state intelligence service and 5.85 USD million in lawsuit expenses, wherein multi-national conglomerate Samsung paid on Lee's behalf of his possible owning of a car parts firm.…”

Advertisement

Emphasis ours. Because…wow. 

How very China of them.

Any chance Samsung - a company obviously willing to bribe South Korean presidents to the tune of millions of dollars - got a little quid pro quo in the form of the South Korean government fining Samsung-competitor-Qualcomm almost $1 billion? Under the most dubious and lawless of circumstances?

It is not outside the realm of possibility…at all.

President Donald Trump and his administration have most thankfully made intellectual property protection a focal point of their global trade negotiations. 

Because if the other side is massively stealing from you - your trade relationship ain’t exactly balanced and fair. 

Trump has focused his intellectual-property-protecting attentions on China. 

He should widely broaden the fix of his gaze. 

Because as we said at the outset- the world isn’t a very nice place. 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos