Investigators Find 177 Dead Dogs With Gunshot Wounds at 'No Kill' Animal Rescue
A Democratic Majority Will Destroy Women's Rights
Things Only Get More Confusing at NPR; Politico Is Blameless for Predicting Gas...
Antifa Is Now Threatening to Kill the Federal Judges Who Sent Members to...
Did Rep. Jayapal Really Say That Listening to Angel Parents Is a Waste...
RI Gun Store Saw Long Lines Ahead of State's Assault Weapon Ban
American Legion Riders to Escort Historic U.S. Flag Into Washington for America's 250th...
The Face of American Socialism Is Rich, White, and College Educated
The Supreme Court's Birthright Citizenship Mistake
World Cup: U.S. Defeats Bosnia 2-0 to Advance in Electric Fashion
Tim Walz Helps Pardon Laotian Man Convicted of Raping 10-Year-Old
Mexican National Sentenced to Five Years for Smuggling Drugged Children Across Border
DOJ Sues Two States Over Gun Laws
Former SSA Employee Convicted of Stealing $1.8M by Impersonating Dead Beneficiaries
Arkansas Woman Sentenced to 18 Months for Multi-State Unemployment Fraud
OPINION

Lawsuit Reform and the RIght to Trial

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.
Lawsuit Reform and the RIght to Trial

This article is a response to Lindsay Boyd's Town Hall article, "Lawsuit Climate 2008: The REAL Climate Crisis."

Last week Lindsay Boyd, Townhall.com’s Associate Editor, posted a glowing review of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce’s Institute for Legal Reform’s  recently released “Lawsuit Climate 2008: Ranking the States.” 

Before readers vest too much credibility in this “survey” of the civil justice system in all 50 states, some warnings are in order. 

Advertisement

First, a poll of in-house counsels and senior litigators who represent corporations with annual earnings in excess of $100 million guarantees a remarkably narrow view of state court systems.  After all, these individuals are all responsible for defending corporations against lawsuits.  Not exactly a broad spectrum of opinion!

Further, buried in the “methodology” section of the report is the tacit admission that the attorneys surveyed were not expected to have direct, in-depth knowledge of a state’s court system.

Interestingly, the $100 million corporate earnings floor happens to bring into the survey some of the business interests – notably pharmaceutical manufacturers and insurance companies – that are among the largest financial backers of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and also the most frequent subjects of serious legal claims of negligence and/or misconduct.  Their participation in this bogus “survey” represents nothing more than a very self-interested attempt to undermine confidence in the civil justice system and fuel efforts to raise ever-higher the bar of citizens’ access to the courts.

The U.S. Chamber routinely rails against “greedy trial lawyers,” counting on reflexive support from conservatives in its efforts to undermine the civil justice system.

But conservatives should be wary of buying what the U.S. Chamber is selling.

As a trial lawyer for thirty-five years, I am among the first to admit that the civil justice is imperfect.  But access to the court system is a constitutionally protected right, and at a time of rampant corporate misconduct it is a right that needs to be zealously defended.  Conservatives who believe in the Constitution and the need for checks and balances in our public life should agree.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement