Over 800 Google Workers Demand the Company Cut Ties With ICE
UNL Student Government Passes SJP-Backed Israel Divestment Resolution
AOC Mourns the Loss of ’Our Media,’ More Layoffs Across the Industry (and...
The Left Just Doesn't Understand Why WaPo Is Failing
16 Years and $16 Billion Later the First Railhead Goes Down for CA's...
New Musical Remakes Anne Frank As a Genderqueer Hip-Hop Star
Toledo Man Indicted for Threatening to Kill Vice President JD Vance During Ohio...
Fort Lauderdale Financial Advisor Sentenced to 20 Years for $94M International Ponzi Schem...
FCC Is Reportedly Investigating The View
Illegal Immigrant Allegedly Used Stolen Identity to Vote and Collect $400K in Federal...
$26 Billion Gone: Stellantis Joins Automakers Retreating From EVs
House Oversight Chair: Clintons Don’t Get Special Treatment in Epstein Probe
Utah Man Sentenced for Stealing Funds Meant to Aid Ukrainian First Responders
Ex-Bank Employee Pleads Guilty to Laundering $8M for Overseas Criminal Organization
State Department Orders Evacuation of US Citizens in Iran As Possibility of Military...
OPINION

Obamacare to Squeeze Private Insurance

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.

An independent health research group concluded that President Obama's public health insurance plan is likely to put private insurers out of business.

The study isn't just stating the obvious. Researchers John Sheils and Randy Haught of the Lewin Group worked through several different scenarios to show how different public plans might affect private insurance. Their findings varied widely because Obama has given few details on exactly what his plan would entail.

Advertisement

The two things they did have to work with were Obama's stated goals of 1) including only individuals, the self-employed, or small businesses in a public plan and 2) modeling a future expansion of public insurance on the existing Medicare system. Taking those two factors into consideration, the researchers found that public premiums would be 30% less than private premiums, leading 32 million people to ditch their private insurance for the less expensive public ones.

More outstandingly, if the type of public insurance plans put forth by Senators Clinton and Edwards were enacted - meaning that Medicare-like insurance was available to anyone who wanted it - the number of people on the public health care dole would climb to 121.2 million. 119.1 million people would leave private insurance - a 2/3 reduction.

Medicare pays hospitals 30 percent less and doctors’ offices 20 percent less than private insurance because of its ability to bargain based on volume. Many think that public plans would reduce the rate of uncompensated care, because lower income individuals would have an easier time finding coverage. But the Lewin Group predicted that there would be a net decrease in compensation for doctors and hospitals because of decreased rates, even if decreased uncompensated care was taken into consideration.

Advertisement

Robert Book, a Senior Research Fellow at the Heritage Institute, explained why public, single-payer systems account for reduction in coverage in a recent web memo:

Although physicians usually face "take it or leave it" contracts from insurance companies, and most physicians have little ability to actually negotiate, a health plan that sets payment rates too low will find that many physicians choose to "leave it."...In order to continue to sell the health plan (either to individuals or to employers), the insurance company will have to increase payments to induce physicians to join.

The Lewin Group's study, titled "The Cost and Coverage Impacts of a Public Plan: Alternative Design Options," was designed as a "how to" manual for increased public health care, Sheils told the AP.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement