USA Today Once Again Eats Pavement Over This Tweet About Caitlin Clark
YouTuber Ms Rachel Just Cut a Campaign Check. Take a Wild Guess of...
Dems Know They Probably Should've Kept This Poll Private, Right?
Disbarred for Defending Trump: ACLJ Takes the Fight to the Supreme Court
New York Times Puts Brutal Dictator on Its Fashion List, Then Quietly Deletes...
USA Today Gets Tripped by Its Caitlin Clark Opposition. AP Weeps We No...
Thought Crimes Come to Minnesota
Forcing Assisted Suicide Is Unconstitutional
Trump Roasts the Media, RFK Jr., and Nikki Minaj at WHCA Dinner. Here's...
Bosnian War Crimes Suspect Indicted for Lying on U.S. Citizenship Application
Whitmer Endorses Stevens Over Socialist El-Sayed in Michigan Senate Primary
Florida Financier Sentenced to 20 Years for Laundering Funds Tied to Haitian Assassination
Two Georgia Men Plead Guilty in $550,000 New York Film Tax Credit Scam
NM Woman Pleads Guilty in $3.9 Million Medicaid Transportation Fraud Scheme
Trump Demands Key 'Reconciliation 3.0' Step Passed Before August Recess
OPINION

Obamacare to Squeeze Private Insurance

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.
Obamacare to Squeeze Private Insurance

An independent health research group concluded that President Obama's public health insurance plan is likely to put private insurers out of business.

The study isn't just stating the obvious. Researchers John Sheils and Randy Haught of the Lewin Group worked through several different scenarios to show how different public plans might affect private insurance. Their findings varied widely because Obama has given few details on exactly what his plan would entail.

Advertisement

The two things they did have to work with were Obama's stated goals of 1) including only individuals, the self-employed, or small businesses in a public plan and 2) modeling a future expansion of public insurance on the existing Medicare system. Taking those two factors into consideration, the researchers found that public premiums would be 30% less than private premiums, leading 32 million people to ditch their private insurance for the less expensive public ones.

More outstandingly, if the type of public insurance plans put forth by Senators Clinton and Edwards were enacted - meaning that Medicare-like insurance was available to anyone who wanted it - the number of people on the public health care dole would climb to 121.2 million. 119.1 million people would leave private insurance - a 2/3 reduction.

Medicare pays hospitals 30 percent less and doctors’ offices 20 percent less than private insurance because of its ability to bargain based on volume. Many think that public plans would reduce the rate of uncompensated care, because lower income individuals would have an easier time finding coverage. But the Lewin Group predicted that there would be a net decrease in compensation for doctors and hospitals because of decreased rates, even if decreased uncompensated care was taken into consideration.

Advertisement

Robert Book, a Senior Research Fellow at the Heritage Institute, explained why public, single-payer systems account for reduction in coverage in a recent web memo:

Although physicians usually face "take it or leave it" contracts from insurance companies, and most physicians have little ability to actually negotiate, a health plan that sets payment rates too low will find that many physicians choose to "leave it."...In order to continue to sell the health plan (either to individuals or to employers), the insurance company will have to increase payments to induce physicians to join.

The Lewin Group's study, titled "The Cost and Coverage Impacts of a Public Plan: Alternative Design Options," was designed as a "how to" manual for increased public health care, Sheils told the AP.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement