Rural Counties in Texas Are Declaring Local Immigration 'Disasters’
Why Is This Pro-Life Group Souring on Their Keynote Speaker?
DHS Planned Meeting With Leftist Groups Who Pushed Border Patrol Whipping Hoax
Why LeBron James Is Annoyed With the Media
Kanye West Makes Alex Jones Look Sane
How Much Worse Can the Biden Economy Get in 2023? The CBO Weighs...
Mandatory Recount Ordered in Colorado Congressional Race
Democrat Senators Are Worried About Title 42 Ending at the Border
A Return to Mask Mandates? There's More COVID Mess Coming Out of LA...
McConnell: By the Way, House Democrats Have Chosen a Conspiratorial Election Denier As...
Here's How Many Millionaires Collected COVID Unemployment Income
'I Tried My Best': Musk Takes Action Against Ye After Latest Tweet
November Jobs Report Sends Stock Futures Tumbling
McCarthy Signals GOP Plan to Investigate J6 Committee
Did Obama Really Just Say That About Biden?

2020 “Moderates” Declare War on Warren

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of
AP Photo/John Minchillo

Wednesday’s Democratic primary debate had more in common with a food fight than a reasoned political discussion. Each candidate knew it might be their last night on a debate stage – and for many of them it definitely will be. This naturally led to fiery exchanges.

Pete Buttigieg attacked Rep. Tulsi Gabbard for her support of President Donald Trump’s removal of troops from Northern Syria. Elizabeth Warren attacked Joe Biden on many of his past positions, including his initial support of the Iraq War. 

Sen. Kamala Harris flailed at everyone. At one point she tried to convince Warren – the new frontrunner – to join her in calling for Twitter to delete President Trump’s account.

“No” was the answer she got back.

But more importantly, this debate was the first time the “moderates” truly went on the attack against the progressives, chiefly Warren.

Health care and taxes defined the night. Warren was on the defensive for refusing over and over to give a straight answer about whether “Medicare For All” will raise taxes on the middle class. 

Each answer was like the first:  

"Costs will go up for the wealthy, they will go up for big corporations and for middle-class families, they will go down," she explained. "I will not sign a bill into law that does not lower costs for middle-class families."

Buttigieg immediately attacked her for dodging: "Your signature is to have a plan for everything, except this. No plan has been laid out to explain how a multi-trillion dollar hole in this plan that Sen. Warren is putting forward is supposed to get filled in," he said. 

Sen. Amy Klobuchar spent the entire night rebutting Warren’s ideas, especially Medicare For All. The midwesterner rightfully called them “pipe dreams” that cost too much money.

In fact a report released Wednesday by the left-leaning Urban Institute said Medicare For All would require a $32 trillion tax increase.

Even taxing “the rich” was surprisingly controversial. Andrew Yang attacked Senator Warren’s wealth tax, pointing out how similar proposals have already been tried and abandoned by Germany, France, and Denmark.

But Warren wasn’t the only progressive to take fire. Pete Buttigieg called Beto O’Rourke’s support of gun confiscation a “shiny object” that distracts from universal background checks and red flag laws, both of which he argued are more attainable.

As the primary continues, these attacks will only become more common. The reason for this is obvious: desperation. With time running out and polling requirements becoming stricter, candidates need to differentiate themselves quickly. 

Most candidates are trying to do this by sprinting as far left as possible, with Beto saying churches should lose tax-exempt status for believing in traditional marriage and Harris trying to get Trump’s Twitter account shut down. Earlier in the race Castro tried the same thing by pushing for the decriminalization of all border crossings. Castro, Harris, and Beto have all seen this strategy blow up in their faces, creating more far more backlash than support. 

Even worse, progressives don’t seem to care. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Ilhan Omar, and other progressive representatives endorsed Bernie Sanders, cementing progressive support for the 78-year old senator.

All of this means that going left is not a viable option, especially considering how extreme the Democratic Party has already gone. Moving rhetorically away from the far left seems to be the best way for candidates to distinguish themselves.

In addition, Biden’s numbers are slipping. A bombshell report by CNN based on campaign filings shows that Biden only has $9 million left in his account, a fraction of his rivals. He has spent more money than he raised for the third month in a row – painting a picture of a candidate who simply doesn't inspire people, at least not enough for them to open their wallets. Sanders, on the other hand, has over $30 million.

If he fizzled out, where would Biden’s supporters go? That’s a question Klobuchar and Buttigieg hope to answer. If they can present themselves as defenders of capitalism they would almost certainly get a chunk of Biden’s support.

Last night’s debate was the first shot in a war that’s been simmering for a year. No matter how many times she calls them "Republican talking points" Warren will be forced to address concerns from her more moderate counterparts about her desire to tax the middle class.

Emmanuel Sessegnon is a communications associate at Americans for Tax Reform.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member


Trending on Townhall Video