Al Green Tried to Shove a Sign in Trump's Face. Here's What It...
Wait, That's What Set Off Libs About Abigail Spanberger's SOTU Response? You're Gonna...
The Vibes for the US Men's Hockey Team Are So High, We Got...
Canadians Are Having a Rough Week
Iranian Students Torch Regime’s Symbols As Protests Erupt on Colleges
Team USA Attacked for Love of Country As Prominent Figure for Both Hockey...
Look Who Ro Khanna Is Bringing to the State of the Union Tonight
Tom Tiffany Fires Back After Evers Says Wisconsin Would ‘Implode’ Without Illegal Immigran...
Is Time Running Out for Sanctuary Cities?
Gun Rights Group Wants Explanation From Anti-Gunner Bloomberg Over Epstein Ties
Dan Bongino Goes Nuclear on Candace Owens
Speaker Johnson Slams Democrats for Holding Five Counter-Events to Trump’s State of the...
Dan Bongino on the Mexican Cartels: The Donroe Doctrine Is Not a Joke...
SURPRISE: Guess What Thomas Massie Is Doing for the State of the Union
The Career of Tim Walz Is Over, and He Intends to Destroy Gun...
Tipsheet

Oversight Committee to EPA: ‘We Need Somebody Who We Can Fire’

Oversight Committee to EPA: ‘We Need Somebody Who We Can Fire’

The House Oversight and Government Reform committee held a hearing Wednesday morning to question Environmental Protection Agency officials about the rampant employee misconduct tainting their agency.

Advertisement

Ahead of the interrogation, the Oversight panel launched an investigation into the EPA and found several instances of employee fraud, weed and porn possession, and thousands of dollars in theft from the agency, and therefore taxpayers. 

How did leadership respond? With slaps on the wrist.

Rep. Jody Hice (R-GA) picked just one egregious example from their findings to ask EPA Acting Deputy Administrator Stanley Meiburg how the agency decided that a 30-day suspension for an employee who pled guilty to stealing thousands of dollars from the agency would be the best punishment?

“There were many factors a deciding official uses” to render punishments, Meiburg said defensively. “I am obligated to consider all of those.” At the time, Meiburg said he was aware of only $3,000 being stolen and deferred the blame to the regional administrators.

Rep. Buddy Carter (R-GA) pushed another EPA witness on the issue. He asked Patrick Sullivan, the assistant inspector general for investigations, how an employee who was found with weed possession was placed on paid administration leave for seven and a half months.

Advertisement

Sullivan admitted there was “massive abuse” prior to changes of the rules. The new policy, he said, limits administrative leave to 10 days.

Hice couldn’t help exposing the agency’s double standard. The EPA “routinely goes after businesses for much less serious offenses and throws fine after fine at them,” he noted. In comparison, the agency does little to reprimand its own employees who engage in criminal behavior.

The hypocrisy is “disgusting,” he concluded.

Why would the EPA do this? Would the private sector allow it?

After asking these important questions, Hice urged the EPA to send someone to Capitol Hill who they can hold directly accountable. 

“We need somebody who we can fire.”

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement