Did The New York Times Criticize 'Epic Fury' Using the Man Investigated for...
Gavin Newsom Is Many Things. 'Pro-Family' Is Not One of Them.
Donald Trump Is a Great Man of History
So, What Is Normal?
JFK's Grandson Proves the Networks Still Bend the Knee to Kennedys
Trump Avoiding Repeating History in Iran
Men Are Back
The Supreme Court Should Protect Children From Predators
America Must Lead the Charge Against the Political Abuse of Religion
The Rules Were Never Meant for Them
The U.S. Needs Japan More Than Ever
For America’s 250th Birthday, Make the Senate Great Again
Tony Gonzales Suspends Campaign After Finally Admitting to the Affair He Denied for...
State Department Says That U.S., Venezuela Have Re-Established Diplomatic Relations
Federal Court Sentences Illegal Alien to Prison for $343K SNAP Benefits Fraud
Tipsheet

FBI Unlocks San Bernardino Terrorist's iPhone Without Apple's Help

FBI Unlocks San Bernardino Terrorist's iPhone Without Apple's Help

The FBI vs. Apple spat has come to an end as the FBI used a "mystery method" to finally unlock the iPhone used by San Bernardino shooter Syed Rizwan Farook. The FBI had previously dropped a hearing with Apple after the agency announced that it had found a way to break into the encrypted iPhone without the assistance of the company.

Advertisement

WASHINGTON (AP) — The FBI says it successfully used a mysterious technique without Apple's help to break into an iPhone linked to the gunman in a California mass shooting.

The surprise development effectively ends a pitched court battle between Apple and the Obama administration.

The government told a federal court Monday without any details that it accessed data on gunman Syed Farook's iPhone and no longer requires Apple's assistance. Farook and his wife died in a gun battle with police after killing 14 people in San Bernardino, California, in December.

Previously, FBI had been pursuing legal action to force the company to develop some sort of "backdoor" into the device. Apple was hesitant to comply as the company felt that doing so would potentially be very dangerous. Now, it looks as though all parties can be satisfied by this conclusion.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement