'We're F**ked': Dem Donor Reveals Her Family Member Knew Dems Were Cooked After...
How Did This Happen? F-18 Shot Down in the Red Sea in Friendly...
A 'Missing' GOP Rep Has Been Found...and It's Not a Good Situation
Merry Christmas, And Democrats Can Go To Hell
A Quick Bible Study Vol. 247: Advent and Christmas Reflection - Seven Lessons
O Come, O Come, Emmanuel, and Ransom Captive Israel
Why Christmas Remains the Greatest Story of All Time
Why the American Healthcare System Has Been Broken for Years
Christmas: Ties to the Past and Hope for the Future
Trump Should Broker Israeli-Turkish Rapprochement for Peace in Middle East
America Must Dominate in Crypto
Biden Was Too 'Mentally Fatigued' to Take Call From Top Committee Chair Before...
Who Is Going to Replace JD Vance In the Senate?
'I Have a Confession': CNN Host Makes Long-Overdue Apology
There Are New Details on the Alleged Suspect in Trump Assassination
Tipsheet

FBI Unlocks San Bernardino Terrorist's iPhone Without Apple's Help

The FBI vs. Apple spat has come to an end as the FBI used a "mystery method" to finally unlock the iPhone used by San Bernardino shooter Syed Rizwan Farook. The FBI had previously dropped a hearing with Apple after the agency announced that it had found a way to break into the encrypted iPhone without the assistance of the company.

Advertisement

WASHINGTON (AP) — The FBI says it successfully used a mysterious technique without Apple's help to break into an iPhone linked to the gunman in a California mass shooting.

The surprise development effectively ends a pitched court battle between Apple and the Obama administration.

The government told a federal court Monday without any details that it accessed data on gunman Syed Farook's iPhone and no longer requires Apple's assistance. Farook and his wife died in a gun battle with police after killing 14 people in San Bernardino, California, in December.

Previously, FBI had been pursuing legal action to force the company to develop some sort of "backdoor" into the device. Apple was hesitant to comply as the company felt that doing so would potentially be very dangerous. Now, it looks as though all parties can be satisfied by this conclusion.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement