Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Wednesday, October 29, 2008
Peter Pitts :: Townhall.com Columnist
Closing the Idealism Gap on Healthcare Reform
by Peter Pitts
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
With unemployment at 10.2%, what will happen by the end of Obama's first term?



A new survey from the Center for Medicine in the Public Interest shows that there is an “idealism gap” among young voters when it comes to their support for government-managed health care. While a strong majority -- 83 percent of those polled -- believes that America’s healthcare system is in need of reform, just 49 percent support paying for a new government-run health care program through taxes.

These results weren't surprising. With tens of millions of Americans uninsured and costs through the roof, change is obviously -- and urgently -- needed. But voters are rightly skeptical of paying for a massive overhaul of our system.

Already, the U.S. government pays for around half of all healthcare expenditures. In Great Britain, where health care is socialized, 95 percent of all healthcare costs are paid for by the taxpayer.

The problem with government-run health care isn't just its price tag. Canada and other countries with “universal” care have seen increased government intervention in which types of treatments patients are allowed to access are based on cost rather than effectiveness.

For patients like Linda O’Boyle of the United Kingdom, such policies can be deadly. She was diagnosed with cancer and told that medication not covered by the National Health System would increase her chances of survival. So she used her savings to pay for the medications. Upon discovering this, the NHS stopped allowing her to have chemotherapy because government laws ban patients from combining public and private care. She died in March.

Patients in the U.K. and Canada also have longer wait times to see specialists than do insured patients in the United States. Twenty one percent of Canadian hospital administrators said it would take over three weeks to do a biopsy for possible breast cancer on a 50-year-old woman. In the United States, fewer than one percent of hospital administrators said it would take that long.

With horror stories like this, it isn't surprising that 62 percent of the young U.S. voters polled said they would not support healthcare reforms that could increase wait times, availability of medicine, or increase government involvement in decisions affecting patients. Continued...

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | Next >
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Peter Pitts is co-founder and President of Center for Medicine in the Public Interest.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
Astroturf
Peter Pitts, an old high school classmate of mine, has long been a lobbyist for Big Pharma -- the large drug companies which are scared to death that the government might possibly exert some bargaining muscle with regard to drug costs. Several years ago, he spearheaded a campaign against parallel importation of pharmaceuticals -- a free market answer to the problem of high drug prices. Now, he is paid well by the same drug companies to oppose anything else that might make drugs more affordable, including "single payer" national health insurance or even a "public" health insurance option. Best to read anything he says with this in mind.

Health Insurance
There is a group of people who are at risk in the health insurance lottery. These are individuals who are age 50-64. If you are self-employed or lose your job, you may be unable to get remotely affordable insurance, if at all. Apparently 50 is the magic number when the pricing starts to get really ugly. Many people are and will be losing their jobs in this nasty economy. COBRA is awfully expensive for someone with a dramatically reduced or suddenly non-existent income.

I don't have the answers, but there is much wrong with the system we have now and it has been well-known for many years. Any of us who don't have government jobs are particularly vulnerable.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.