Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Wednesday, October 07, 2009
Larry Kudlow :: Townhall.com Columnist
The Mundell-Laffer Solution
by Larry Kudlow
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
What would you rather watch?

Team Obama is in economic trouble on two fronts right now: The dollar could be headed toward its demise while the jobs and unemployment numbers have gotten worse. (The unemployment rate is up to 9.8 percent as of the September report released last week.) And there’s a simple policy mix the White House could adopt to fix this. It could enact the Mundell-Laffer supply-side approach of a steady King Dollar for price stability and low marginal tax rates to spur jobs and economic growth.

Arguing with Idiots By Glenn Beck

Columbia professor and Nobel Prize winner Robert Mundell and Reagan advisor Arthur Laffer put this formula to work nearly 30 years ago, and it launched a massive low-inflation, bull-market prosperity. Of course, I am a supply-side fossil. I am a dinosaur and a relic of the past. But I still believe this approach could work again, even if it’s not going to happen.

The dollar has been falling on and off for nearly ten years, and it’s in big trouble right now. The commodity inflation, housing bubble, and oil shock of recent years all can be traced to dollar weakness and excess money-creation by the Fed. A weak dollar helped destroy the Bush Boom and create the Great Recession. But now people are talking about ending the dollar’s reserve-currency status.

According to London’s Independent, the Arab oil producers in the Gulf are planning with China, Russia, Japan, and France to end dollar transactions for oil and move instead to a basket of currencies that might include the Japanese yen, the Chinese yuan, and the euro, along with gold and some kind of regional Gulf-state currency.

I say, where there’s smoke there’s fire. The dollar-demise story just won’t go away, and it’s clear now that China and others have lost confidence in the greenback. For the U.S., this is mostly a self-inflicted wound. And the Treasury and the Fed are in denial about it. The gold price has jumped all the way to $1,050, while the dollar index has fallen again. Without question, the U.S. is creating too many dollars through the Fed, and fiscal disarray continues to threaten more of the same.

And here’s a real conflict brewing in the financial markets: The Fed is fighting deflation with a near-zero interest-rate target, while gold, the dollar, and commodity markets are signaling that inflation is the real problem. Somebody is going to be very right here, and somebody is going to be very wrong. I’m betting on the markets being right.

So I have a thought, at least for the short run: The Fed should follow Australia, the first G-20 country to raise its target interest rate. The Aussies lifted their rate a quarter point to 3.25 percent. Right now the U.S. Fed should lift its target rate by 25 basis points. The fed funds target is currently 15 basis points, so this move would make it 40 basis points. It would be a dollar-protection signal; a price-stability signal. At the least, it would be a beginning. Next, the Treasury should buy some dollars in the open market to back up the Fed. Continued...

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | Next >
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author

Lawrence Kudlow is host of CNBC's Kudlow & Company

Be the first to read Lawrence Kudlow's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.

legalized theft
We're in the terminal crisis of democracy. The people--both big and little--know that they can vote the losers' money into their pockets; government textbooks used in school openly speak of government as a redistributive machine; and wealth has only become loot to grab when you can. Aristotle spoke of this back in the 4th century B.C. American politics-as-usual has rewritten the 10th Commandment as "covet everything that is your neighbors, and craft your laws so you can get it."

A Negative Income Tax
The fundamental flaws inherent in socialism would be easily apparent if only those who execute it would be honest and open about what they are doing. As it is, the execution is so complex and convoluted that it obscures the true dynamics of the process. If the proper thing to do is to redistribute income from those who produce to those who do not so that all can benefit fairly then let’s do it visibly and upfront by instituting a ‘negative income tax’.

The concept is simple. First, determine what a ‘living wage’ for each individual should be. Various methods’ could be used but for the sake of argument let us say that was determined to be $30,000/year. Everybody fills out an income tax return reporting their actual net income. If that is below $30,000, the result would be an income tax return equal to the difference. If that was greater than $30,000 the result would be an income tax due equal to the difference.

Of course, for those unfortunates, that would constitute a tax rate of 100% so we could maintain a graduated rate similar to what we have today and adjusted so that the result would be whatever we wanted the governments take to be in order to cover whatever we wanted the government to spend.

The problems are immediately apparent but TH word count prevents me from detailing all of them. The biggest problem, of course, would be who would bother working for a job that pays only $30,000/year when they could get that much without working? Who knows how much it would take over $30,000 to get anyone to work at all; $40,000, $50,000? Whatever that would be there would be no jobs paying less. (Abd I suspect it would become next years "living wage").

The ramifications are extensive and I leave it to others on the Right to point them out. I leave it to those on the Left to point out how this would differ philosophically from what they otherwise advocate.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.