Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Wednesday, November 19, 2008
Kathleen Parker :: Townhall.com Columnist
Heresies and Other Truths
by Kathleen Parker
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Do you feel the leaked information from a global warming alarmist organization is meaningful?



WASHINGTON -- As Republicans sort out the reasons for their defeat, they likely will overlook or dismiss the gorilla in the pulpit.

Three little letters, great big problem: G-O-D.

I'm bathing in holy water as I type.

To be more specific, the evangelical, right-wing, oogedy-boogedy branch of the GOP is what ails the erstwhile conservative party and will continue to afflict and marginalize its constituents if reckoning doesn't soon cometh.

Simply put: Armband religion is killing the Republican Party. And, the truth -- as long as we're setting ourselves free -- is that if one were to eavesdrop on private conversations among the party intelligentsia, one would hear precisely that.

The choir has become absurdly off-key, and many Republicans know it. But they need those votes!

So it has been for the Grand Old Party since the 1980s or so, as it has become increasingly beholden to an element that used to be relegated to wooden crates on street corners.

Short break as writer ties blindfold and smokes her last cigarette.

Which is to say, the GOP has surrendered its high ground to its lowest brows. In the process, the party has alienated its non-base constituents, including other people of faith (those who prefer a more private approach to worship), as well as secularists and conservative-leaning Democrats who otherwise might be tempted to cross the aisle.

Here's the deal, 'pubbies: Howard Dean was right.

It isn't that culture doesn't matter. It does. But preaching to the choir produces no converts. And shifting demographics suggest that the Republican Party -- and conservatism with it -- eventually will die out unless religion is returned to the privacy of one's heart where it belongs.

Religious conservatives become defensive at any suggestion that they've had something to do with the GOP's erosion. And, though the recent Democratic sweep can be attributed in large part to a referendum on Bush and the failing economy, three long-term trends identified by Emory University's Alan Abramowitz have been devastating to the Republican Party: increasing racial diversity, declining marriage rates and changes in religious beliefs.

Suffice it to say, the Republican Party is largely comprised of white, married Christians. Anyone watching the two conventions last summer can't have missed the stark differences: One party was brimming with energy, youth and diversity; the other felt like an annual Depends sales meeting.

With the exception of Miss Alaska, of course.

Even Sarah Palin has blamed Bush policies for the GOP loss. She's not entirely wrong, but she's also part of the problem. Her recent conjecture about whether to run for president in 2012 (does anyone really doubt she will?) speaks for itself:

"I'm like, OK, God, if there is an open door for me somewhere, this is what I always pray, I'm like, don't let me miss the open door. Show me where the open door is. ... And if there is an open door in (20)12 or four years later, and if it's something that is going to be good for my family, for my state, for my nation, an opportunity for me, then I'll plow through that door."

Let's do pray that God shows Alaska's governor the door.

Meanwhile, it isn't necessary to evict the Creator from the public square, surrender Judeo-Christian values or diminish the value of faith in America. Belief in something greater than oneself has much to recommend it, including most of the world's architectural treasures, our universities and even our founding documents.

But, like it or not, we are a diverse nation, no longer predominantly white and Christian. The change Barack Obama promised has already occurred, which is why he won.

Among Jewish voters, 78 percent went for Obama. Sixty-six percent of under-30 voters did likewise. Forty-five percent of voters ages 18-29 are Democrats compared to just 26 percent Republican; in 2000, party affiliation was split almost evenly.

The young will get older, of course. Most eventually will marry, and some will become their parents. But nonwhites won't get whiter. And the nonreligious won't get religion through external conversion. It doesn't work that way.

Given those facts, the future of the GOP looks dim and dimmer if it stays the present course. Either the Republican Party needs a new base -- or the nation may need a new party.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Kathleen Parker is a syndicated columnist with the Washington Post Writers Group.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read Kathleen Parker's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
Republican Dismal Future
The 78% of Jewish voters who went for Obama are going to be very disappointed when he pushes them under the train as the Democrat party is pro-Palestinian. This will have world-shaking consequences because the Israelis have 100 or so nukes and they are not about to meekly check into the nearest gas chambers again without doing something about it. Democrats can be thankful they own the college professor class since they can be given credit for the 66% of the young that went for Obama. They have been fed the Core Democrat Marxist line for the last 20 or 30 years and that is all they know. You are correct about the long term demographic problem for the Republicans. When Obama and company give amnesty to the illegals you have seen your last Republican / Conservative administration. I doubt that the "people of color" and their puppets who will end up in charge are going to be providing affirmative action to the minority white folks and their quaint traditional founding father culture. You should have been thinking about this when you sandbagged the McCain/Palin ticket.

Leave Kathleen
Take it somewhere else

I agree, Ms Parker.
A vocal minority so entrenched in its own intractibility that it labels every Christian who doesn't believe in its exact tenets as not a true Christian, and every Republican who is not a social conservative as not a true Republican, is not a group which can or will effectively rebuild the Republican Party.

Church & State in 1792

The idea that there is, and ought to be, no connection between religion and civil policy appears to rest upon this absurd supposition: that men, by entering into society for mutual advantage, become quite a different class of beings from what they were before — that they cease to be moral beings and consequently lose their relation and obligations to God as His creatures and subjects and also their relations to each other as rational social creatures. If these are the real consequences of civil connections, they are unhappy indeed as they must exceedingly debase and degrade human nature; and it is readily acknowledged these things being true, that religion can have no further demands upon them.

But if none of the relations or obligations of men to their Creator and each other are lost by entering into society — if they still remain moral accountable beings and if religion is the glory and perfection of moral beings — then the connection between religion and good government is evident and all attempts to separate them are unfriendly to society and inimical [harmful] to good government and must originate in ignorance or bad design.

Religion essentially consists in friendly affection to God and His rational offspring [i.e., mankind], and such affection can never injure that government which hath public happiness for its object. [Timothy Stone 1792]

.She's right.
As much as I hate to say it the various groups that voted for BO are growing and will soon be an unstoppable majority. And she’s right-these groups are certainly not white evangelical Christians. They are groups that, based on US Government statistics, account for the majority of violent crime, STDs, AIDS, and who give the least to charity. That’s right, BO’s supporters are sexually promiscuous, use abortion as birth control, spread disease, and terrorize the streets of America. One again, I base these statements on statistics compiled by the US Government. Check them out yourself.

Godlessness is the enemy…

What do you think are the origins of American constitutionalism? Did the Enlightenment come to colonial America or did the Reformation come here? What is the origin of rule of law? Did it come from the secular elite or from the Protestant Reformers who gave us an open Bible in the English tongue? Why do we have separation of powers and why was the intent of the constitution to limit federal power? These things and many more of the checks and balances are the result of the Reformed doctrine of the depravity of men.

What of the purpose of the first amendment? A free church free from the entanglements of state is essential for a free state. The love of civil liberty and the sanctity of life and the sacredness of private property all come from the divine liberty granted to men through the gospel.

The chaos around us is not the result of too much of God in the culture, but too little. Godlessness is our enemy, not God. Do you think we can recover constitutionalism in a way contrary to its origin? It is madness to deny your own heritage.

KP- Change that I can never believe in.
Please don't ASSUME that I am a member of the "vast right wing conspiracy" when I decide that I WANT to fight FOR my religion to STAY in my heart, not be taken out so, maybe, your New GOP can put whatever religion they want back in there.

KP, you made an argument based on a faulty assumption.

Your kind of new way of defining the Conservative movement is to now call yourself a man because she still can have a baby. Even if the GOP never wins another election, your argument is much a bridge to nowhere because some of us will never be able to label
ourselves as LIBERAL Republicans.

KP: It is time for you to just cross over to the Dark Side (or is Light side since Obama won?). If you do, will you then FINALLY criticize your NEW President and leave the rest of us the f--- alone?


SO, NOW K.P. SAYS WHAT SHE REALLY THINKS

Now we know why Kathleen hates Sarah Palin so much and why she loathes the base of the Republican party. Its because they are Christians and she finds that its just not fashionable for the time that we live in.

"Yes, we did produce a near-perfect republic. But will they keep it? Or will they, in the enjoyment of plenty, lose the memory of freedom?
Material abundance without character is the path of destruction."
Thomas Jefferson

Lets see, Kathleen believes that the only way to save the Republican party is to jettison the base.....so, then what Kathleen? Do you believe liberal Democrats like yourself will become Republicans then? Turn your back on God? You have got to be kidding...

Kathleen: Now, I am convinced that you are a fool and a complete moron.

Get ready for the NORTH AMERICAN UNION and then the NEW WORLD ORDER/ONE WORLD GOVERNMENT.

ValiantforTruth in TX...Right on.
If they keep changing the definition based on their "desire" or emotional state, my neighbor may then decide she desires to marry my car and tell me when I can drive her spouse! Change I WON'T believe in, even if KP succeeds is redefining the GOP. Next, I will be told that I lack standing to sue her and deny her definition. Thus, her definition will deem me to be without Constitutional protection even though I am stilling paying Ford or GM for the car.

“Spreading my wealth around (or your’s)” with her because theoretical American guns are aimed at me, never works. I will wind up living in a country without Constitutional rights and led by a Chinese-type government that is standing in my driveway protecting her marriage definition. As an aside, it is truly frightening that the new American President, claimed to be a constitutional law teacher (not professor – so, I am unsure of what “association” he had with the university), believes this legal nonsense and Americans are too dumb to realize they can never really redefine society in a manner that allows them to take my possessions without opening up their own governmentally-forced garage sale.

In law school, I used to have to debate Leftwing nut jobs that wanted to "change" jus