The controversy here maybe should be that Perez Hilton injected politics into a beauty pageant; that Perez Hilton intolerantly berated a contestant for supplying an answer that differs from his desired answer; that Perez Hilton judged a beauty contest based on a contestant's position on a moral question that he is obsessed with; or that Perez Hilton was invited to be a judge at a beauty pageant where the contestants didn't have to duct tape their genitals. The controversy shouldn't be that a pageant contestant gave an uncontroversial answer to a question on gay marriage. Would this have been news had she answered that she disagreed with the majority of her state and supported gay marriage?
Dan Flynn's Take on Perez Hilton
