Tipsheet

Was Last Night's Special Congressional Election in Minnesota Good or Bad News for the GOP?

Guy Benson
Guy Benson  |  August 10, 2022 1:01 PM

The short answer is: The Republicans won this battleground seat in southern Minnesota, which was a hold for the party. The point of elections is to win, and the GOP did. But was it an under-performance, pointing to Democratic momentum in the battle to control the House? Depending on what baseline you use, a case can be made in either direction (with the key caveat in place that special elections are often weird and unrepresentative). Democrats and liberal elections analysts are comparing the GOP margin last night to Trump's margin in the district. When that's the framing, it certainly looks underwhelming for Republicans. Here's the negative spin (with Finstad winning by just over four points): 


Wasserman positions this as a significant Democratic over-performance, similar to another recent Congressional special election in which the GOP held a seat, but by a substantially smaller margin than when Trump carried the district in 2020. There might be something to that. Finstad blew it out in rural areas last night, hitting historic margins as a Republican, but the more suburban areas really boosted Jeff Ettinger, the Democrat. Other signals were more mixed. The Democrat carried five of the top six most populous counties in the district. The Republican won all the others, often by lopsided margins. Looking at these basis points, Democrats may be understandably excited about their improving prospects. But then there's this: 


This election was to replace Republican Rep. Jim Hagedorn, who passed away in February. Look at the district's recent history. In 2020, Hagedorn, as the incumbent – and with Trump on the ballot, winning the district by double digits – posted just a three-point win. In the 2018 blue wave year, Hagedorn squeaked through by the skin of his teeth, winning by less than half of one percentage point. Before that, the seat was in Democratic hands (sometimes quite narrowly) since the 2006 cycle. This is a swingy, competitive district. And despite lacking the incumbency advantage, and Democrats nominating a strong candidate, the Republican candidate achieved the highest percentage (R) of the district vote since 2004. In other words, Finstad over-performed versus House GOP candidates in the district but underperformed versus Trump's margin there. One factor that could cut either way is that Republican turnout in MN-01 was not terribly impressive overall. They won, but with only a fraction of the voters who gave Trump a big cushion two years ago (it's also highly relevant that Congressional Republican candidates have run substantially behind Trump's appeal in this district for many years): 


If GOP turnout is mediocre in November – or if it's good but roughly matched by Democrats – the red wave people have been predicting for months may look more like a ripple, if that. For what it's worth, RealClearPolitics elections analyst Sean Trende thinks Democrats' crowing based on last night's results is overblown: 


He's responding to chatter than Democrats might actually have a somewhat distant but real chance of holding the House. That remains very unlikely in my book, but if Republicans take things for granted, November could be a big letdown. But in a number of places that voted yesterday, especially Wisconsin, there wasn't a lot of complacency detected on the GOP side: 

Recommended

Someone Should Tell That Bucks County Dem Where She Can Shove Her Shoddy Apology Matt Vespa
Why Again Do We Still Have a Special Relationship With the Tyrannical UK? Kurt Schlichter


These points might help explain why MN-01 wasn't better than it was. I'll leave you with a note on the national environment. Democrats have effectively tied Republicans on the generic ballot averages, overall. But a tie would still mean a fairly bad night for them, and there are compelling reasons to believe late-deciders will tend to break red: 


Click through to read why there are some red-wavy signs floating around on House races. The Senate? Looking more challenging for Republicans at the moment, based on the cycle map, candidate quality, and fundraising struggles.