Tipsheet

Hoaxer Smollett Keeps Lying: 'I've Been Truthful and Consistent on Every Single Level Since Day One'

In a stunning turn of events, Chicago officials have dropped all 16 felony charges against Jussie Smollett, the former Empire star who evidence shows staged a 'hate crime' against himself earlier this year.  The decision was made by the office of Cook County State's Attorney Kim Foxx, who recused herself from the case after text and email exchanges with a powerful ally of Smollett's family were revealed.  Foxx's team has now abruptly ended the state's prosecution of the disgraced actor.  Here's their stated reasoning:

“After reviewing all of the facts and circumstances of the case, including Mr. Smollet’s volunteer service in the community and agreement to forfeit his bond to the City of Chicago, we believe this outcome is a just disposition & appropriate resolution...”

They're effectively conceding his guilt, but letting him off with "time served" (it's unclear whether he's actually done the community service in question) and a tiny forfeited bond.  A judge has also agreed to seal all the relevant records in the case, a stunning development that isn't getting enough attention.  In response, Smollett's attorneys issued a mind-bending celebratory statement, reiterating the ludicrous claim that their client is an innocent victim who was attacked by unknown assailants.  How can this be spun as a just outcome if the criminal is maintaining his farcical lies?


Local media is reporting that the Chicago Police Department -- which has already demanded a federal probe of Foxx's handling of this entire matter, hinting that she's corrupt -- now wants to know whether Smollett will at least be required to reimburse the city for its costly investigation into the fraud he perpetrated:


The cops are furious, as they should be; they weren't even given a heads-up.  Incidentally, for those pushing Trump-collusion "exoneration" snark in response to these dropped charges, give it a rest.  This isn't about Trump, and there is no comparison whatsoever to be drawn.  Trump was vindicated on collusion following an exhaustive two-year federal probe.  Smollett's culpability has been fully established by reams upon reams of actual evidence -- from phone records, to video footage, to confessions from co-conspirators, to purchase records, to personal checks (the check we've seen was reportedly for personal training as well as, ahem, "a favor beyond the training").  He paid off two associates to stage a phone hate crime.  We've literally seen the receipts.  

Note that Ms. Foxx's office isn't disputing Smollett's obvious criminality.  They're just absolving him of any serious legal consequences for his actions (previous community service and the forfeited bond hand-slap notwithstanding), leading to the breathtakingly brazen claims of exoneration from Smollett and his lawyers.  And they're doing so after their boss demonstrated her own conflict of interest, which led her previous recusal.  Even if you're inclined to view this as an imperfect but sound determination, i.e., sparing the city a costly trial and a nasty brawl over CPD's reputation, Foxx's fingerprints being anywhere near this resolution will fan the flames of a corruption narrative.  We need to know the extent of her involvement in this, as well as every step of her team's reasoning.  Also, why on earth did the judge seal the records, making it harder for other Chicago officials to push back against the bogus claims Smollett is still peddling?  Remember, CPD has said there's even more evidence against Smollett that hasn't yet been made public.  Is the judge trying to guarantee that we'll never see it?

Two final points: First, recall that CPD implicated Smollett in the 'threatening letter' piece of this saga, which could mean that the actor may still be on the hook for federal charges.  Second, think about what a horrible message would be sent if the person plainly responsible for an extremely high-profile hate crime hoax is spared any meaningful punishment.  When authorities fail to hold people responsible for society-destabilizing crimes, they incentivize more of the same.  That's not justice.  Parting thought: Even if the relevant authorities thought a trial, with the accompanying media circus, wasn't worth it, why didn't they at least force an admission and apology out of Smollett, who originally claimed that the attack was perpetrated by white Trump supporters?  And how can he wriggle away from this mess without paying significant restitution to the city he smeared -- particularly after police determined that his hoax was motivated by financial greed?

UPDATE - The Assistant State's Attorney who made the final call to drop the charges says his office stands by the investigation and the filing of the charges. This is not an exoneration, he says, just a decision to prioritize prosecuting criminals who threaten public safety.  I don't agree with this calculation (the effect of crimes like this on society should also weigh heavily), but again, how could they not even wring a confession out of the guy in exchange for walking free?  The case, according to basically everyone involved, was rock solid.  Smollett allegedly rehearsed the damn thing, for crying out loud.  The police are saying they were prepared for trial, and this sandbagging is a "punch in the gut."

UPDATE II - Chicago's Mayor and Police Superintendent just absolutely torched Smollett and the State's Attorney's decision in a press conference: