Republicans Have an Ineptitude Problem
What Exactly Is the Purpose of NATO in the Year 2026?
Plainclothes Miracle
Jim Acosta Whines That Trump Is 'Winning' His War on the Press
America at 250: Rediscovering Exceptionalism in Rail and Space
The Sudden Political Star of Trump II: Marco Rubio
Barabbas or Bust
Prayer to Remove the Veil of Evil Darkness Over Iran
Good Friday, Resurrection Sunday and the Search for Peace in a Troubled World
Why the Bernie-AOC AI Strategy Is a Gift to Big Tech
Why Not Boots on the Ground in Iran
The Passion Is Not About Death — It’s About a Wedding
Todd Blanche: ActBlue Allegations a 'Priority' of New DOJ
Secretary of War Pete Hegseth Moves to End Gun-Free Zones on U.S. Military...
National Capital Planning Commission Approves White House Ballroom in 8–1 Vote
Tipsheet

Kristi Noem Has a New Explanation for Why She Shot Her Dog

Kristi Noem Has a New Explanation for Why She Shot Her Dog
AP Photo/John Raoux

This interview was totally unnecessary—this whole circus was avoidable. Yet, South Dakota Gov. Kristi Noem decided to detail how she killed her family dog, Cricket, who reportedly was an abysmal hunting dog, killed a bunch of chickens belonging to a family friend, and was overall unruly. Who knows, the South Dakota Republican wrote how she shot the dog, which has drawn some very strong reactions.

Advertisement

 Have we forgotten about how Obama ate a dog? I couldn’t care less, but Noem is trying to keep her bid alive in the veepstakes, and she must know it’s over. It may be overblown. There may be double standards, but that’s how it is. Her latest spin is that Cricket wasn’t a puppy; she’s a victim of the fake news media, and she chose the safety of her family in the end.

So, Cricket was Cujo? Noem’s memoir isn’t anything new. Since the days of James Fenimore Cooper, politicians, and national figures have written about the tough decisions they had to make. Noem’s book isn’t the problem, but I’m sure there were numerous votes she had to take in Congress and her record as governor, which could demonstrate her point. Her decision to run for South Dakota’s at-large district in 2010 was a major one for her and her family alone. She could have left out shooting Cricket. We might have learned about it in the end, but this funeral pyre is hers alone. She brought the wood and oil; I think the damage is already done. 

Advertisement

Related:

CONSERVATISM

Again, I’m not a big animal guy, but many others are, and they’re not pleased with this tale.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement