I'm Stunned USA Today Published This Op-Ed From a Dem About Trump's State...
This Always Happens With These Anti-ICE Stories in the Media
This State's Lawmakers Are Pushing a Bill That Would Ban Facial Recognition Technology
Top Baton Rouge Aide Indicted for Stealing Taxpayer Funds in 'Kickback' Scheme
What Will Stop the Iranian Regime's Oppression and Murder of Its People?
The Media Once Scolded Us for Using a Certain Label They Now Love
Illegal Alien Hurt Three Kids While Evading Arrest. Guess Who the Mayor Blames.
California Dems Took Nearly $1B From a Solar Panel Project to Build a...
Florida Airport Becomes the First Nationwide to Ban Passengers From Wearing Pajamas
JD Vance Says There Is ‘No Chance’ of Prolonged War as US Warships...
Here's How Mamdani's Snow Shoveling Program is Going
Steve Hilton's CalDOGE Says It Uncovered Over $900M in State Fraud in Second...
What the World Needs Now
U.S. Seeks Forfeiture of Seized Oil Tanker and 1.8 Million Barrels of Oil
Illinois Pair Convicted in $5 Million Multistate Pyramid Scheme Case
Tipsheet

That Judge Who Said Trump Must Surrender His Tax Returns Has An Interesting Donor History

That Judge Who Said Trump Must Surrender His Tax Returns Has An Interesting Donor History
AP Photo/Alex Brandon

Okay, so we all know the hammer the judiciary dropped on the Trump administration last night, right? A federal judge sided with House Democrats over their subpoenas over President Trump’s tax returns. Democrats want six years worth of returns, including those from the president’s businesses. The subpoenas targeted an accounting firm and to no one’s surprise this Obama-appointed judge sided with Democrats (via NYT):

Advertisement

President Trump’s accounting firm must turn over his financial records to Congress, a Federal District Court judge ruled on Monday, rejecting his legal team’s argument that lawmakers had no legitimate power to subpoena the files.

But Mr. Trump vowed that his legal team would appeal rather than permit the firm, Mazars USA, to comply with the subpoena and the ruling, so the legal fight is far from over.

The ruling by the judge, Amit P. Mehta of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, was an early judicial test of the president’s vow to systematically stonewall “all” subpoenas by House Democrats, stymieing their ability to perform oversight of Mr. Trump and the executive branch after winning control of the chamber in last year’s midterm elections.

Mr. Trump’s legal team, led by William S. Consovoy, had argued that the House Committee on Oversight and Reform had no legitimate legislative purpose in seeking Mr. Trump’s financial records and was just trying to dig up dirt — like finding out whether the president broke any laws — for political reasons, so the subpoena exceeded its constitutional authority.

Advertisement

Related:

DONALD TRUMP

Oh, and did we forget that Judge Mehta was an Obama donor as well. It’s time to play everyone’s favorite game, folks: ‘If this were a Republican donor, the media would’…certainly, cover it like some corrupt bargain. But alas, that’s not how things operate in the Democrat-media complex, where two sets of rules govern America’s two dominant political philosophies. Once gets pilloried for stupid crap, while the other can be corrupt, commit crimes, lie, cheat, steal, and totally get away with it—it must be nice to be a Democrat. 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement