Federal Judge Shuts Down TN Dems Over New Congressional Map
Senate Parliamentarian Just Delivered Some Brutal News About the Reconciliation Package
These Students Want to Cancel a Speaker for Not Being Part of Their...
Nicholas Kristof's Motte-and-Bailey Fallacy
The NY Times Continues Flailing Over Kristof's Column; Politico Warns Democrats Might Turn...
Georgia Pro-Gun Bill's Veto Doesn't Mean What Anti-Gunners Seem to Think
We Now Know Why Brigitte Macron Slapped the French President Last Year
Man Convicted of Running Chinese Police Station in Manhattan's Chinatown
FBI Offers $200K Reward for Former Air Force Agent Who Defected to Iran
Utah Podiatrist, Two Nurses Indicted in $29M Medicare Fraud Scheme
Florida Jury Convicts HealthSplash Founder in $1 Billion Medicare Fraud Scheme
U.S. Supreme Court Temporarily Restores Nationwide Mail Access to Abortion Pill
Mexican National Sentenced to 11 Years for Running Major U.S.-Mexico Border Smuggling Oper...
2018 West MI Woman of the Year Sentenced for Allegedly Stealing $1.4M Meant...
Trump Has the Cards for an AI Deal With China
Tipsheet
Premium

NYT Acknowledges the Real Reason Most Illegal Border Crossers Are Coming

NYT Acknowledges the Real Reason Most Illegal Border Crossers Are Coming
AP Photo/Mark Lennihan, File

The New York Times is finally acknowledging a truth about the border crisis that most people following the issue long ago knew to be true. The reality is that the vast majority of those heading toward the U.S.-Mexico border are not seeking asylum. In other words, they would not be able to convince judges that by returning to their home country they’d face persecution due to their religion, race, nationality, political opinion or membership in a particular social group. We saw this on display with the recent caravan heading toward the U.S. where those leading the group carried banners that read “exodus from poverty.”

Indeed, many are motivated to make the long and dangerous trek for economic reasons. But since that’s not a valid reason to be given asylum there is something else at play, which the Times acknowledges: they know once they get here, they’ll be able to stay… “forever.”  

“And by and large, they are not wrong,” the analysis states.  

If the "asylum seekers" told judges the real reason they came they’d quickly be deported. So instead, they claim asylum even it’s it a weak case because it buys them time. U.S. law allows those seeking asylum to stay here until their cases are closed, and with court dates set years ahead and work authorization cards given if a decision isn’t handed down in 150 days (“virtually impossible today”), they know they’ll be able to begin establishing a life here. 

The United States is trying to run an immigration system with a fraction of the judges, asylum officers, interpreters and other personnel that it needs to handle the hundreds of thousands of migrants crossing the border and flocking to cities around the country each year. That dysfunction has made it impossible for the nation to expeditiously decide who can remain in the country and who should be sent back to their homeland. […]

Most asylum claims are ultimately rejected. But even when that happens, years down the road, applicants are highly unlikely to be deported. With millions of people unlawfully in the country, U.S. deportation officers prioritize arresting and expelling people who have committed serious crimes and pose a threat to public safety. (NYT)

During an interview with the Times last month, one illegal border crosser from Colombia said she didn’t know “anyone who has been deported.”

Now consider what that means for the country when about 2.5 million illegal immigrants came in fiscal year 2023 alone. That's why President Trump and conservative commentators are calling for mass deportations. 

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement