Lefty Trump Supporter's Epic Response to Larry David's Op-Ed Attacking Bill Maher's Dinner...
They Did It Again: Trump Set Another Trap for Dems on Rogue Judges
How a CNN Political Commentator Shut Down the Leftist Meltdown Over the FBI...
A Judge Was Arrested for Trying to Help an Illegal Alien Escape. Let's...
If It Saves One Life?
Joe Biden Attends Pope Francis' Funeral, Reminding Us We're Better Off Without Him...
Did This State Democratic Rep Have the Worst Reaction to Wisconsin Judge's Arrest?
Trump Sure Has Some Thoughts About The New York Times’ Coverage
Jon Ossoff Really Doesn't Look to Be Making Reelection Easy on Himself
Jennings Offers Telling Reminder About How Media Has Botched Story on Arrest of...
Trump: I'm Not 'Trolling' When I Say Canada Should Join the US
Hakeem Jeffries Boasts About Blocking Citizen-Only Voting Rule
Nancy Mace Blasts Clemson’s 15-Gender Lunacy
Trump Meets With Zelensky While in Rome for Pope Francis' Funeral
These Posts From Ed Markey, Amy Klobuchar in Reaction to Judge's Arrest Were...
Tipsheet
Premium

NYT Acknowledges the Real Reason Most Illegal Border Crossers Are Coming

AP Photo/Mark Lennihan, File

The New York Times is finally acknowledging a truth about the border crisis that most people following the issue long ago knew to be true. The reality is that the vast majority of those heading toward the U.S.-Mexico border are not seeking asylum. In other words, they would not be able to convince judges that by returning to their home country they’d face persecution due to their religion, race, nationality, political opinion or membership in a particular social group. We saw this on display with the recent caravan heading toward the U.S. where those leading the group carried banners that read “exodus from poverty.”

Indeed, many are motivated to make the long and dangerous trek for economic reasons. But since that’s not a valid reason to be given asylum there is something else at play, which the Times acknowledges: they know once they get here, they’ll be able to stay… “forever.”  

“And by and large, they are not wrong,” the analysis states.  

If the "asylum seekers" told judges the real reason they came they’d quickly be deported. So instead, they claim asylum even it’s it a weak case because it buys them time. U.S. law allows those seeking asylum to stay here until their cases are closed, and with court dates set years ahead and work authorization cards given if a decision isn’t handed down in 150 days (“virtually impossible today”), they know they’ll be able to begin establishing a life here. 

The United States is trying to run an immigration system with a fraction of the judges, asylum officers, interpreters and other personnel that it needs to handle the hundreds of thousands of migrants crossing the border and flocking to cities around the country each year. That dysfunction has made it impossible for the nation to expeditiously decide who can remain in the country and who should be sent back to their homeland. […]

Most asylum claims are ultimately rejected. But even when that happens, years down the road, applicants are highly unlikely to be deported. With millions of people unlawfully in the country, U.S. deportation officers prioritize arresting and expelling people who have committed serious crimes and pose a threat to public safety. (NYT)

During an interview with the Times last month, one illegal border crosser from Colombia said she didn’t know “anyone who has been deported.”

Now consider what that means for the country when about 2.5 million illegal immigrants came in fiscal year 2023 alone. That's why President Trump and conservative commentators are calling for mass deportations. 

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement