Professor Turley Explains How the Impeachment Managers Just 'Lost Their Case'

Posted: Jan 25, 2020 2:45 PM
Professor Turley Explains How the Impeachment Managers Just 'Lost Their Case'

Source: AP Photo/Alex Brandon

George Washington University Law Professor Jonathan Turley was the only witness in last month's impeachment hearing featuring constitutional scholars who didn't appear to have a liberal vendetta against President Trump. While his fellow academics and witnesses concluded that Trump had abused his power in their testimony before the House Judiciary Committee, Turley observed that their being angry doesn't justify the removal of a president. They actually need evidence.

"So, we're all mad," Turley said at the time. "Where has it taken us? Will a slipshod impeachment make us less mad or will it only give an invitation for the madness to follow in every future administration? That is why this is's wrong because this is not how you impeach an American president."

Turley observed the same losing strategy in the Democratic impeachment managers' opening arguments. Instead of focusing on a narrative that relied on facts or precedent, Adam Schiff, Jerry Nadler and company instead leaned on their anger. Nadler at one point called the duly elected president a "dictator" and accused any senator who voted against additional witnesses of being involved in a White House "cover up."

"They went so far that they basically accused the president of being a Russian asset and just short of having a KGB email address," he said. "It was very stinging language."

The Democrats forgot who their audience was, Turley explained.

"You just lost your case because there's no way that those Republican senators are going to buy that narrative. Not at all."

It turns out senators don't like being lectured or being the subject of outrageous rumors. On Friday, Schiff suggested that a Trump associate had threatened Republicans who don't vote to acquit Trump.