Oh, You Knew CNN Had to Run With This Development About the J6...
Lawmaker Under Fire for Representing Somalia Instead of Her Constituents
Supreme Court Just Agreed to Rule on This Controversial Immigration-Related Executive Orde...
This Is What Gavin Newsom Had to Say After Halle Berry Leveled Him
How This Prominent Health Foundation Became a Progressive Political Bankroller
The Media's Latest Defense of Minnesota's Somali Community Fails Basic Math
Mamdani Vows to Make NYC a Haven for the Homeless
The Peace President: Trump Honored With FIFA's 2025 Peace Prize
A Violent Murderer Said He Felt 'Unsafe' in Men's Prison. Guess What Illinois...
Here's How U.K. Prime Minister Keir Starmer Worked to Silence American Conservatives
JD Vance Blasts 'Bullsh*t Narrative’ Blaming Trump Administration for Biden’s Economy
Katie Porter's Support Nosedives in California Gubernatorial Race Following Viral Outburst...
Obama Went Bragging About Obamacare This Week, There's Just One Problem
If We Care About Lawfare, Start With the DEI and Woke Requirements Being...
Boomers Wanted Grandkids. The Fed Helped Price Them Out of Existence.
Tipsheet
Premium

Professor Turley Explains How the Impeachment Managers Just 'Lost Their Case'

AP Photo/Alex Brandon

George Washington University Law Professor Jonathan Turley was the only witness in last month's impeachment hearing featuring constitutional scholars who didn't appear to have a liberal vendetta against President Trump. While his fellow academics and witnesses concluded that Trump had abused his power in their testimony before the House Judiciary Committee, Turley observed that their being angry doesn't justify the removal of a president. They actually need evidence.

"So, we're all mad," Turley said at the time. "Where has it taken us? Will a slipshod impeachment make us less mad or will it only give an invitation for the madness to follow in every future administration? That is why this is wrong...it's wrong because this is not how you impeach an American president."

Turley observed the same losing strategy in the Democratic impeachment managers' opening arguments. Instead of focusing on a narrative that relied on facts or precedent, Adam Schiff, Jerry Nadler and company instead leaned on their anger. Nadler at one point called the duly elected president a "dictator" and accused any senator who voted against additional witnesses of being involved in a White House "cover up."

"They went so far that they basically accused the president of being a Russian asset and just short of having a KGB email address," he said. "It was very stinging language."

The Democrats forgot who their audience was, Turley explained.

"You just lost your case because there's no way that those Republican senators are going to buy that narrative. Not at all."

It turns out senators don't like being lectured or being the subject of outrageous rumors. On Friday, Schiff suggested that a Trump associate had threatened Republicans who don't vote to acquit Trump.

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos