WE GOT HIM: Missing F-15 Crew Member Who Got Shot Down Over Iran...
Police Arrest Man for Shooting Alleged Pedophile Soliciting Minors for Sex
Trump Reminds Iran That the Clock Is Ticking
He Used Drugs to Exploit His Victims – Now He's Facing Decades in...
An Easter Message to the British People
Trump Administration to Investigate Spain's 'Human Rights Failures' After Euthanasia of Ga...
My King’s Day
A Quick Bible Study Vol. 314: Easter and the Shroud of Turin, an...
Allahu Akbar, Europe!
Stephen A. Smith’s Surprising Take on Trump Attending SCOTUS Oral Arguments And Birthright...
But for the Grace of God... How Lucky We Are
The Transcendental Argument for the Existence of God
The Founding Fathers and the Resurrection
What Joy Is There This Easter Amid War and Division?
Easter Isn’t Just Resurrection — It’s a Wedding Announcement
Tipsheet

Is Ignoring the Law An Option?

Is Ignoring the Law An Option?
I'm just wondering, because as a California resident, there are a few I'd like to ignore (ike the one about plastic grocery bags - you'd think legislators would actually try to save the state from ruin before micromanaging every move its residents make
Advertisement
).  Obviously, kids, don't try this at home -- ignoring the law will get ordinary people in plenty of trouble.

But in fact, if you check out Obama administration policies, it appears that one can indeed simply decide not to follow the laws one disfavors:

Don't like the War Powers Act (all that pesky consultation with Congress)? Ignore it.

Unhappy about the existence of the debt ceiling? Ignore it.

Don't like the Commerce Clause's limitation on government's ability to regulate citizen choices when it comes to health care? Litigate it.

On a more serious note, each instance of the Obama administration's deciding to ignore the law puts more stress on our constitutional system of government.  Each of the instances noted above is an ugly, needlessly dramatic way of trying to reach policy objectives that are, in fact, unpopular.  And that, over time,  undermines the legitimacy of government, and makes it appear (and become) ever more lawless.
Advertisement

Good presidents just don't do this.  For example, there have been many reputable scholars who legitimately have differences of opinions about the constitutionality of the War Powers Act.  Even so, President George W. Bush went to Congress, for example, before committing troops to Iraq -- because it's unwise to provoke constitutional crises.  

It's just part of being a good steward of the country.



Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement