June's Inflation Relief Was a Peace Dividend
Mamdani Is Fundamentally Reimagining Violence
Why the Left Hates Jews and Christians
The Lure of Cheating the Government Without Penalty
Further Proof That Climate Cataclysms Are Just Fearmongering
Private Equity Didn't Kill the Patient
Brightline Is a Boondoggle—Secretary Duffy Must Not Give It Another Bailout
When Friends Stand Together
Indian Americans Are Proud to Be Part of America’s 250-Year Story
Democrats Search for Graham Platner’s Runner-Up
Taxing the Wealthy Can’t Fund Social Security Into Solvency
California Makes Everyone Else Pay for Its Climate Goals With $2.2 Billion Port...
Gang Member's Instagram Cash Flexes Unravel $2.8M Fraud Ring
Third Circuit Spikes New Jersey Ban on 'Assault Firearms' and Large Capacity Magazines
Everything Went Wrong for James Talarico This Week After His Epstein-Tied Backer Was...
OPINION

An Unusual Economy?

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.
An Unusual Economy?
Many in the media are saying how unusual it is for our economy to be so sluggish for so long, after we have officially emerged from a recession. In a sense, they are right. But, in another sense, they are profoundly wrong.
Advertisement

The American economy usually rebounds a lot faster than it is doing today. After a recession passes, consumers usually increase their spending. And when businesses see demand picking up, they usually start hiring workers to produce the additional output required to meet that demand.

Some very sharp downturns in the American economy, such as in the early 1920s, were followed quickly by bouncing back to normal levels or beyond. The government did nothing -- and it worked.

In that sense, this is an unusual recovery in how long it is taking and in how slowly the economy is growing -- while the government is doing virtually everything imaginable.

Government intervention may look good to the media but its actual track record -- both today and in the 1930s -- is far worse than the track record of letting the economy recover on its own.

Americans today are alarmed that unemployment has stayed around 9 percent for so long. But such unemployment rates have been common for years in Western European welfare states that have followed policies similar to policies being followed currently by the Obama administration.

Those European welfare states have not only used the taxpayers' money to hand out "free" benefits to particular groups, they have mandated that employers do the same. Faced with higher labor costs, employers have hired less labor.

The vast uncertainties created by ObamaCare create a special problem. If employers knew that ObamaCare would add $1,000 to their costs of hiring an employee, then they could simply reduce the salaries they offer by $1,000 and start hiring.

Advertisement

But, since it will take years to create all the regulations required to carry out ObamaCare, employers today don't know whether the ObamaCare costs that will hit them down the road will be $500 per employee or $5,000 per employee. Even businesses that have record amounts of cash on hand are reluctant to gamble it by expanding their hiring under these conditions.

Many businesses work their existing employees overtime or hire temporary workers, rather than get stuck with unknown and unknowable costs for expanding their permanent work force.

As unusual as 9 percent unemployment rates may seem to the current generation of Americans, unemployment rates stayed in double digits for months and years on end during the 1930s. Franklin D. Roosevelt's administration followed policies very similar to those of the Obama administration today. He also got away with it politically by blaming his predecessor.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement