Watch Scott Jennings Slap Down This Shoddy Talking Point About the Spending Bill
We Have the Long-Awaited News About Who Will Control the Minnesota State House
60 Minutes Reporter Reveals Her Greatest Fear as We Enter a Second Trump...
Wait, Is Joe Biden Even Awake to Sign the New Spending Bill?
NYC Mayor Eric Adams Explains Why He Confronted Suspected UnitedHealthcare Shooter to His...
The Absurd—and Cruel—Myth of a ‘Government Shutdown’
Biden Was Too 'Mentally Fatigued' to Take Call From Top Committee Chair Before...
Who Is Going to Replace JD Vance In the Senate?
'I Have a Confession': CNN Host Makes Long-Overdue Apology
There Are New Details on the Alleged Suspect in Trump Assassination
Doing Some Last Minute Christmas Shopping? Make Sure to Avoid Woke Companies.
Biden Signs Stopgap Bill Into Law Just Hours Before Looming Gov’t Shutdown Deadline
Massive 17,000 Page Report on How the Biden Admin Weaponized the Federal Government...
Trump Hits Biden With Amicus Brief Over the 'Fire Sale' of Border Wall
JK Rowling Marked the Anniversary of When She First Spoke Out Against Transgender...
OPINION

SCOTUS Should Reverse Roe v. Wade Because Abortion Is a Crime Against Humanity

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
AP Photo/Jose Luis Magana

The 1973 Supreme Court decision of Roe v. Wade is about to be put on life support and the plug may be pulled. Speculation is running high that SCOTUS may reverse Roe in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization. Arguments will be heard in October.

Advertisement

The Mississippi law bans abortion after 15 weeks of pregnancy. This is a direct challenge to Roe, which says states may not prohibit abortion until viability of the child. If the court upholds the Mississippi law, then the heart of Roe will be gone. States will be free to restrict and even ban abortion.

A brief authored by attorney Allan Parker of the Justice Foundation on behalf of the National Institute of Family of Life Advocates, or NIFLA, urges the reversal of Roe. The first of five specific arguments set forth in the brief states that abortion is a crime against humanity. Since Roe allows for a continuation of this manslaughter, it must be overturned. To date, more than 64 million children have died by abortion since 1973.

Abortion is a gruesome and hideous act. It is not like a dermatologist removing a wart or a dentist removing a tooth, as abortion proponents argued in their early efforts to legalize it. Rather, abortion brutally dismembers a living human being. Skulls are crushed. Arms and legs are dismembered. And the human remains of children are scraped together, placed in a plastic body bag, and sent to an incinerator for disposal. Animals killed at slaughterhouses for food are treated more humanely. The procedures for the demise of condemned prisoners on death row are far more compassionate.

Is abortion a procedure that we should continue to tolerate? Decent humanity requires that it be ended.

Roe allows for this brutality at any time in pregnancy. It said abortion may not be prohibited if necessary to preserve the “health” of the mother. However, its broad definition of health allows abortion for any reason and at any time, including late stages of pregnancy.

Advertisement

According to a 2014 report from the Charlotte Lozier Institute, the United States is only one of seven nations that allow for late-term abortions. North Korea, Vietnam and China are three others. This is not an honorable fraternity of nations with which to be a member. 

The Lozier report states: “The United States is within the top 4% of most permissive abortion policies in the world ... The clear norm among countries that permit elective abortion is to limit abortion to before 20 weeks gestation, and elective abortion is more commonly limited to 12 weeks (the first trimester).”

How could America, founded on the idea that all human beings are endowed by their creator with an inalienable right to life, allow this to happen? The answer to this is that Roe v. Wade created the path leading to where we now find ourselves.  

 Dehumanization of victims of oppression is always necessary to justify oppression. The dehumanization of pre-born babies in Roe justified to some the acceptance of abortion. Roe made two horrific blunders that dehumanized the unborn.

First, the Court said that it need not decide the “difficult question of when human life begins.” It then proceeded to allow for aborting unborn children throughout pregnancy. Second, it said that the unborn, whether human or not, are not persons under the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution, and thus their lives are not protected as such. 

There never has been a debate in scientific circles regarding the humanity of the unborn. This is simply a scientific fact. Even if there is a question about the humanity of the unborn, simple logic dictates that decisions concerning life and death should always favor a presumption of life. 

Advertisement

Roe’s denial of personhood to a class of human beings was the second dehumanization of the unborn and opened the door for the death of millions. Such a ruling had precedent only in the tragic Dred Scott Decision, which denied African slaves the right to become citizens and prepared the groundwork for a bloody Civil War.

Abortion is a crime against humanity. Roe denied humanity to an entire group of human beings and opened the door to the American abortion culture. It must be completely discarded.

America’s promise of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness must be made a reality to all human beings. The unborn, the most vulnerable of our human family, are at the very least entitled to life.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos