OPINION

SCOTUS: Actually Parents Do Matter

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.

There is something almost breathtaking about the fact that this even has to be said out loud.

Parents matter.

Not bureaucrats.

Not school boards.

Not activist teachers.

Not the state of California.

Parents.

Yet here we are in 2026, with the United States Supreme Court having to step in and remind a massive public-school system that the people who actually raise children are still supposed to be involved in their lives.

In a divided ruling this week, the Court sided with a group of parents challenging California policies that allowed schools to conceal a childs gender identity decisions from their own families. The justices reinstated a lower-court order that prevents schools from misleading parents and requires them to respect parental instructions regarding how their children are addressed at school.

Think about that sentence for a moment.

The highest court in the land had to tell a state government that schools cannot deceive parents about their own children.

This case arose after California adopted policies encouraging or allowing educators to hide a students gender transition at school from their parents. The 2024 California SAFETY Act even barred schools from requiring teachers to inform parents if their child adopted a different gender identity at school.

In plain English, that meant a child could be living one identity at school and another at home and the adults entrusted with their education were expected to help keep the secret.

Thats not education.

Thats state-sponsored deception.

Parents across the state challenged the policy, arguing that the government had no right to insert itself between families and their children, particularly when issues of identity, faith, and moral formation were involved.

The Supreme Court agreed at least for now.

The justices granted the parents request to reinstate a federal district court order preventing schools from misleading parents and requiring schools to follow parental guidance regarding names and pronouns used for their children.

In other words, the Court acknowledged something most Americans instinctively know: parents are not optional accessories in their childrens lives.

They are the primary authority.

That truth is older than the Constitution. Older than the Republic itself.

It is rooted in the natural order of things.

Long before legislatures existed, mothers and fathers were responsible for raising, guiding, and protecting their children. Civilizations function because families function. And families function because parents have both the authority and the responsibility to shape the lives of the children entrusted to them.

Yet in recent years, a new ideology has tried to flip that order upside down.

Under this view, the state knows better than parents. Teachers become the primary moral authorities. School administrators become gatekeepers of identity. Parents are tolerated but only if they agree with the prevailing cultural orthodoxy.

If they disagree?

Well, then they can simply be left out of the conversation.

That is precisely what California attempted to institutionalize.

Under the states approach, a school could facilitate a childs social transition different name, different pronouns, different identity while actively keeping the parents in the dark.

Imagine the arrogance required to think thats acceptable.

Imagine believing that government employees should decide when parents deserve to know what is happening in their own childs life.

This is not compassion.

It is ideological overreach.

Supporters of the policy argued that some children might face rejection at home if their gender identity were disclosed. That concern is not imaginary. Every society must take seriously the safety and well-being of vulnerable children.

But the solution cannot be to treat every parent as a potential enemy.

The solution cannot be to normalize deception between children and the people responsible for raising them.

Because once the state claims the authority to decide what parents deserve to know about their children, there is no logical stopping point.

If schools can hide gender identity decisions today, what else might they conceal tomorrow?

Mental health struggles?

Medical decisions?

Political activism?

Faith formation?

The principle is what matters.

And the principle is simple: parents have the primary right and responsibility to guide their children.

That right is not granted by government. It precedes government.

Courts have long recognized this. A century of Supreme Court precedent affirms that parents have a fundamental liberty interest in directing the upbringing and education of their children.

Californias policy trampled that principle.

And for now, at least, the Court has said so.

Notice something important about this decision.

It doesnt end the national debate over gender identity in schools. It doesnt resolve every legal question surrounding student privacy. It doesnt eliminate the complex challenges educators face.

What it does do is reaffirm a foundational truth: families come first.

The state is not the parent.

Schools are not the parent.

Government is not the parent.

Parents are.

And if that sounds obvious to you, congratulations you are more grounded in reality than many of the policymakers who created these rules in the first place.

But theres an even deeper dimension here.

For millennia, cultures across the world have recognized that the bond between parent and child is not merely biological or legal.

It is sacred.

Scripture describes children as a heritage from the Lord and places the responsibility for their instruction squarely on the shoulders of mothers and fathers. Gods design for family life was never intended to be outsourced to bureaucracies or ideological movements.

The family is the first school. The first church. The first place where identity, character, and purpose are formed.

When the state attempts to replace that structure, it does not liberate children.

It destabilizes them.

The Supreme Courts ruling is not the end of this cultural battle. The case will continue through the courts, and similar policies across the country are already being challenged.

But for a moment a brief but meaningful moment the highest court in the land reminded America of something profoundly important.

Parents matter.

Actually, parents matter more than almost anything else when it comes to children.

Because civilizations rise and fall not primarily on their laws or their politics, but on the strength of their families.

And when a society forgets that truth, history eventually reminds it.

Usually the hard way.