Get access to Brad Slager's "Riffed From the Headlines," a daily VIP feature where he looks to bring accountability to the mainstream media. Use promo code FIGHT to get 60% off your VIP membership!
Matching Media Memorandum – VARIOUS OUTLETS
The problem with “it just has to be” reporting is that it requires facts.
As soon as the news came out Saturday of the flooding along the Guadalupe River in Central Texas, numerous journalists rushed out their versions of reporting to highlight and blame the fact that President Trump had cut jobs and services within the National Weather Service.
It was a non-stop torrent of journos who were positively convinced that devastation was caused and lives lost due to the cuts.
Among the worst was Juliette Kayyem of CNN, who has been on a steady stream of claims blaming Trump, all while lacking anything approaching tangible evidence that there were staffing problems causing carnage.
Recommended
This is an absolute tragedy. The question we have to ask is whether any ability to notify or warn was impacted by decreases/DOGE on weather services. I don't know the answer and we can't assume it; the camp may have been isolated. But I'd want to know if I were a parent. https://t.co/NT7acPtk7C
— Juliette Kayyem (@juliettekayyem) July 4, 2025
MAGA and RW media seem very upset today as a chorus of us experts discuss the impact of cuts to weather forecasting. This is the world of disaster information wars. I say this: a total tragedy in Texas and we owe those young girls the willingness to learn from it.
— Juliette Kayyem (@juliettekayyem) July 5, 2025
Then the facts came flooding in.
The actual weather experts in that area say there was no hindrance to the forecasting and warning systems.
A number of meteorologists attested that everything was operational as expected.
In fact, the local weather service was overstaffed for this storm, in anticipation of its arrival. Notices were put out 12 hours before any flooding, and a flash flood warning was made three hours before the onrush.
Dear Journalist:
— Brad Slager: CNN+ Lifetime Subscriber (@MartiniShark) July 7, 2025
The Weather Service in the flood zone was actually over-staffed in preparation for the storm coverage.
Your bleating has all been done for empty, ghoulish reasons. https://t.co/CZhrwER9MN pic.twitter.com/7lGuGq11xa
This meteorologist explains at length that what took place was an unprecedented weather event.
Okay. Let’s talk some facts.
— Chris Martz (@ChrisMartzWX) July 5, 2025
The Camp Mystic flood disaster in Texas is very unfortunate, and I hope that all of the missing girls are found.
The usual suspects are exploiting this tragedy to score political brownie points. Some left-wing activists are blaming this flood on… pic.twitter.com/ODX5Rmpm7G
Pathological Media Amnesia – CNN
That was both one year ago and one president ago.
Among those who have been extremely vocal about blaming the president has been CNN's Dana Bash. For the two days since the flooding, she has not held back from laying the blame on the president’s lap as she politicizes this storm damage.
This comes in direct opposition to the same Dana Bash who, two weeks after the Carolinas were still dealing with the effects of the hurricane flooding, said on the air that the last thing people should do is politicize the government response.'
This is CNN. This is Dana Bash.
— MAZE (@mazemoore) July 6, 2025
Two weeks after the NC flood, after it became painfully clear that the federal response was inadequate, Dana Bash was viciously defending the Biden/Harris Admin and warning about the dangers of politicizing a storm response.
It's only two days… pic.twitter.com/OFGTumuN2L
Stealth Story Evolution – THE NEW YORK TIMES
The biggest danger is in our noticing the change.
In a completely oblivious dose of pulling a journalistic 180, behold the way The New York Times has taken both sides of the issue regarding immigrant gangs in the city of Boulder, Colorado.
NYT Sept 2024: Claims of a gang problem in Aurora CO was a “false story”
— AG (@AGHamilton29) July 3, 2025
NYT today: Democrats were wrong to deny the gang problem in Aurora CO pic.twitter.com/0gUCanTMxm
Reporting on the Mirror – THE NEW YORK TIMES
This almost sounds like an apology for committing journalism.
Over the weekend, the readers of The New York Times had a staggeringly hard time grappling with the fact that the outlet reported on Zohran Mamdani having claimed to be a black man on a college admission form. This was not an empty claim, but an exhaustive research made by its reporter, and it led to speaking directly with Mamdani, who attested that he did, in fact, fill out the form in that fashion.
For that brand of solid journalism, the paper had to have an executive editor come out and explain itself to its readers.
As the @nytimes assistant managing editor for Standards and Trust, I’ve received reader feedback regarding our reporting on Zohran Mamdani’s 2009 application to Columbia University. To provide context on how the reporting came together, I wanted to share some information:
— Patrick Healy (@patrickhealynyt) July 4, 2025
Anti-Social Media – THE NEW YORK TIMES
This level of insult for being…accurate is sure a strange look.
The tensions over that NY Times report were not reserved only for the readers. There was also internal barking taking place for daring to report, again, accurately, about a political candidate running for an important office.
Jamelle Bouie went on an angry rant on Bluesky, delivering insulting barbs toward reporter Benjamin Ryan for daring to report on Mamdani.
He was attacking a NYT reporter in pretty personal ways, I’m sure that’s why they told him to cut it out pic.twitter.com/hLECYBo37v
— Aleph (@woke8yearold) July 4, 2025

