A group called the Native Americans Guardians Association (NAGA, for short) has petitioned the new owners of the Washington Commanders to rename the NFL franchise after its original mascot, The Redskins.
NAGA has set up a petition to raise awareness for the issue and gain momentum for the team's fans to re-claim their historic "Redskins" identity. As of this post's publishing date, nearly 100K have affirmed the proposition.
A spokesman for the group, Billy "Two-Guns" Diekman, told Lawrence Jones that the removal of the team name in 2020 was offensive to him, a Native American, and to other members of his tribe.
"I'm a United States Marine, a two-time combat veteran, I am the epitome of a modern-day Redskin," he said, "The name has deep, deep honor and it's a status symbol of an elite warrior. It's not a slur. It's not a nickname. It's something that we achieve to be."
Indeed, according to a 2016 poll of Native Americans conducted by The Washington Post – the newspaper that led the effort to force the name change – 90% said that they were not offended by the moniker. Further, a subsequent poll from WaPo (because they really, really wanted to get the results to change) asked 500 Native Americans to pick from a list of words that described their feelings about the Redskins name. The word most picked was “proud.”
Ironically, the Post would not release the entire results of that poll, but said that the majority were not offended.
The Washington Post also asked Redskins fans in the DC area if they supported a name change. Over 70% said they wanted Redskins to stay the team mascot. How many times does The Washington Post have to ask the same question before they finally give up?
So, let's recap.
NAGA, representing Native Americans, wants the Redskins name. A vast majority of Native Americans polled not only want the name but actually are proud of the name. And the majority of Washington football fans want the name to revert back to The Redskins.
So, the obvious question is: Who is offended by the name?
Answer: Obviously, the editorial board at The Washington Post. And...by extension, white liberals, in general, and white liberal sports writers, specifically.
"Our voices have not been heard," Diekman said. Not only not heard..completely ignored. Even worse, the 90% of Native Americans who are proud of or (at worst) indifferent about the Redskins name, have had to endure the worst kind of condescending "whitesplaining" from DC liberals in the media as to why they should be offended and how they're "problematic" if they aren't offended.
Sports reporters are generally even more liberal than political reporters. They all went to the same journalism schools with the same professors who put them on the path of identity politics and social justice warfare. They all would much rather be talking politics than sports, evidenced by the blatant hijacking of ESPN whose content now looks more like a dweeb-fest of left-wing commentators from MSNBC than a bunch of jocks talking about the infield fly rule and Patrick Mahomes' QB rating.
Where do you think the celebration of Colin Kaperneck's anti-American behavior came from? Or LeBron James' incoherent pseudo-intellectual (he wears glasses during interviews, after all) race lectures? Or the glorification of Meghan Rapinoe and her vile vitriol?
Until the activists at NAGA call these journalists out directly by name and tell them to stop whitesplaining to them why they should feel attacked by a name that makes them proud, the media and the white elites (who don't even care about the NFL) will continue to have their way.
The feelings and opinions of the alleged offended class, Native Americans, are completely irrelevant on this issue. These "journalists" won't even cover the story in a serious and meaningful way. You see, the issue of the "racist" Redskins name is not about the feelings and sensitivities of those who are being inflicted with the imaginary racism, it's really about the feelings of the actual offended party: white liberals. And they really know how to air their grievances when they're suffering on behalf of the downtrodden.