This Image Says Everything About Trump's White House Correspondents' Association Dinner Sp...
Wait, Is Troy Jackson Eligible to Replace Graham Platner?
How This State Is Starting to Comply With the New Mood Over Election...
Former MSNBC Analyst Admits Republicans Were Right About This Regarding Our Elections
GOP Sends Letter to NJ Governor: What the Hell Happened to Your Voter...
Democrats Do Not Speak for All Women
On National Parents’ Day, Remember: Parents—Not the State—Know and Love Their Children Bes...
The Unlikely Incubators of Liberty
Michigan Man Arrested Over Months-Long Campaign to Threaten ICE Officers
FBI Captures Its Fourth Most Wanted in Five Weeks
Twelve Indicted in Alleged $2 Million Nike Cargo Theft Conspiracy in Memphis
Four Men Plead Guilty in $2.2 Million Medicaid Fraud Scheme
Troy Jackson Crowned As New Maine Senate Nominee
We Now Have the Truth About That Viral ICE Story That Sparked Massive...
The Process to Replace Graham Platner Is Already Off to a Rough Start...
OPINION

Electoral Dysfunction from Barbara Boxer

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.
 Electoral Dysfunction from Barbara Boxer

The U.S. Senate defeated an amendment last week to restrict taxpayer funding of abortions under Obamacare. Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., voted against the measure, arguing that it would require women to buy special riders to purchase abortion coverage.

Advertisement

In defending her no vote, Boxer argued that male senators were doing to women something they would never do to men. Quoth Boxer: "The men who have brought us this don't single out a procedure that's used by a man, or a drug that is used by a man that involves his reproductive health care, and say they have to get a special rider. There is nothing in this amendment that says if a man someday wants to buy Viagra, for example, that his pharmaceutical coverage cannot cover it, that he has to buy a rider. I wouldn't support that."

That quote illustrates why Washington cannot be trusted to overhaul health care.

Get Townhall Magazine FREE

For starters, Viagra does not involve reproductive health care, as Boxer suggested. A man who uses Viagra probably shouldn't be thinking about reproducing, unless he wants company for his grandkids.

What is more, abortion is not health care. It's a reproductive choice -- a legal choice that Congress, since 1977, has chosen not to subsidize.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid argues that in defeating the amendment by Sen. Ben Nelson, D-Neb., the Senate did not authorize the use of taxpayer funds for abortions, but Nelson doesn't see it that way. Nelson thinks the Senate opened the door for government-subsidized abortion. That means Nelson's much-needed Democratic vote might not be there for the final bill for Obamacare.

Advertisement

Now, it's true that Viagra and other erectile dysfunction drugs are designed to remedy the symptoms of specific physiological disorders. But if you watch TV, you know that the pharmaceutical industry none too subtly has been peddling enhanced sexual performance for healthy men.

That is a choice, too -- and men can pay for it.

In fact, while Boxer may say she objects to making men find a plan that covers ED drugs, the folks at Medicare tell me that Medicare does not pay for Viagra or other drugs for erectile dysfunction. (Yes, Medicare used to pay for ED drugs, but no more.) If men want Viagra, they either have to pay for the prescription themselves or find a private plan that covers their ED drug of choice.

Which makes Boxer's Viagra/abortion analogy all that much more, well, limp.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement