Yes, the clip of one of the female jurors saying that the lone holdout, a black man, couldn’t get past the fact that Lindsay Clancy killed her kids was widely circulated. That’s nuts. It’s why you’re there, lady. The woman killed all three of her children in January 2023. Now someone is saying the case could potentially make it better for other women. 

“This would be something that could change something to make it better for other women,” said juror Paula Devlin.

So, letting a child killer walk is good for women? I’m sorry, how have we come to this point? 

I understand that postpartum depression and psychosis do exist — most women don’t kill their children, however. And if there is a fear of losing custody if they come forward with their symptoms, that’s something for the legislatures and experts to tweak. 

Once again, another rinky-dink or outdated operation within our healthcare system has been exposed. And no one wants to fix it. But you know what is always wrong: murder. 

Recommended
AI Model ‘Affirms’ the Gospel and Doubles Down Micah Rate Dear Tucker: No Genocide. Apologize! Kevin McCullough

Now, we have Clancy’s defense attorney, Kevin Reddington, ripping into the lone juror who refused to acquit Clancy by reason of insanity. This has led to a media witch hunt, and this person is likely to be revealed. All because he didn’t want to let a child killer go.