There are a bunch of leftist women who are lionizing Lindsay Clancy, the Massachusetts mother who is currently on trial for murdering her three children in January 2023. The defense has never denied that Clancy murdered her children, who were five years old, three years old, and eight months old at the time. They're currently arguing that Clancy was in the throes of postpartum psychosis, which means she'd spend the rest of her life in an institution rather than in prison.

But the women supporting Clancy believe she is innocent, and they're arguing her ex-husband and the children's father, Patrick, actually committed the crime, pointing to the 911 call — which has not been released publicly — as proof Patrick Clancy was "too calm" upon discovering his children.

Sue O'Connell, a correspondent with NBC Boston, listened to the 911 call and dispelled those rumors.

"So what I'm hearing some people say about Patrick Clancy is not supported by the 911 call. You may have heard that he sounded too calm or that Lindsay Clancy was speaking in complete sentences," O'Connell said. "Let me tell you, I heard the 911 call. I was in the courtroom when it was played with journalists from the mainstream media, independent media, citizen journalists, members of the public, court staff, and the 18 jurors."

Before telling us what she heard, O'Connell gave us some context. "In the 1980s a lot of my friends were dying from HIV and AIDS-related illnesses and most of them were under 30. And one afternoon, I went with a group of people to tell a mother that her son had died."

Recommended
As His Lawyers Push for a New Trial, We Just Learned New Details About the Karmelo Anthony Case Amy Curtis Hamas or Israeli Values? Victor Davis Hanson

"He'd been terminally ill for a while, she knew it was coming, and still the sound she made when she heard that her son was dead is a sound I have carried with me for 40 years," she said. "I've also sat in beautiful theaters and watched extraordinary actors perform grief. Some of the best actors in the world, gifted, coached, with incredible scripts. And what I heard from Patrick Clancy when he found his children did not sound like a performance to me. The screaming, the howling, the crying. It immediately took me back to that doorstep in the 1980s."

Another gave a clear explainer about the case.

"Women, you're making us all look bad," she said. "The reality is, she was on an insane cocktail of psychotropic drugs at the time of the murders. It's really sad. It's terrible to see she was severely struggling with mental illness. Mental illness is real, and it is very, very scary. But also, girls, stop being weird and totally sympathizing with the child killer and blaming the husband."

"Lindsay confessed, the defense agrees, and she'll likely go to the ward for the rest of her life. I swear these people do not care about the children at all. They just wanna make the guy look bad because they hate men," she continued. "But hey, I mean, at least Candace Owens has a new things to warp and make millions off of. Everybody needs to go touch grass."

It's funny she mentioned Candace Owens, who has jumped on the Lindsay Clancy bandwagon, claiming Clancy is not guilty.

"I made my thoughts clear on this the moment that she was arrested, the moment that it made the news. Lindsay Clancy is obviously not guilty. There are a fleet of doctors who should be imprisoned for what they put her on," Owens said. "I regularly speak out against big pharma. They get away with murder all the time and in this case they are getting away with the murder of really her three children but also completely destroyed her life."

"Lindsay Clancy, in my opinion, is not guilty. She was put into an intentional psychosis when she probably just needed to give her kids away for a weekend to get better," Owens added.

Remember, the defense does not dispute that Clancy strangled her children. Clancy confessed.

The only question is whether or not she was in her right mind when she did it. That's the question the courts are deciding this week, not whether or not Clancy did it.

But that evidence doesn't seem to matter. The report of Sue O'Connell is ignored because it doesn't fit the narrative, and the grift continues.