Monday saw the beginning of Trump's "hush money" trial involving Michael Cohen and Stormy Daniels in New York City, and jury selection has proven even more fraught a process than some expected after the first day. At the conclusion of the first round of the process, more than half the prospective jurors from the first pool of 96 to be selected — out of the 200 total called on Monday — had been excused after telling the court they were unable to be fair and impartial in weighing the evidence set to be presented at trial. 

The potential jurors who did not self-identify as being unable to serve on the jury next face 42 multi-part questions before the court as the judge and attorneys for both sides consider each potential juror's answers.

The first few questions posed to potential members of the jury are biographical and relatively generic: 

The next portion seeks to elicit more information about how and from where a juror gathers information and news. "Which of the following print publications, cable and/or network programs, or online media such as websites, blogs, or social media platforms do you visit, read or watch?" the questionnaire probes. Among the options for potential jurors are the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, New York Post, Huffington Post, CNN, MSNBC, Fox News, Newsmax, Truth Social, Facebook, X, amd Tik Tok (sic).

Potential jurors are also asked open-ended questions about which podcasts they watch or listen to and what, if any, talk radio programs they consume. 

The following section seeks more information about the potential jurors' past experience or knowledge of law enforcement, the criminal justice system, or the legal field. Questions include whether the potential juror, their relative, or "a close friend" has been the victim of a crime; employed by a law enforcement agency or by a government entity; employed in the accounting or finance field; interacted with the criminal justice system; or accused and/or convicted of a crime.

Potential jurors are also asked point-blank whether they "have any political, moral, intellectual, or religious beliefs or opinions which might prevent you from following the Court's instructions on the law or which might slant your approach to this case."

Moving on to the mechanics and demands of sitting as a juror in the trial, the questionnaire asks about any health conditions that "might interfere" with a potential juror's ability to be at the courthouse, whether they take any medications that would prevent them from being able to concentrate during proceedings and deliberations, and if they practice a religion that would prevent them from sitting as a juror on particular days/evenings. 

Again, potential jurors face a blunt question: "Can you give us an assurance that you will be fair and impartial and not base your decision in this case upon a bias or prejudice in favor of or against a person who may appear in this trial, on account of that person's race, color, national origin, ancestry, gender, gender identity or expression, religion, religious practice, age, disability, sexual orientation or political views?"

Potential jurors are also asked if they can "promise to guard against allowing stereotypes or attitudes about individuals or about groups of people, referred to as an implicit bias, influence your decision?"

Moving on to very specific questions dealing with the case and its key players, potential jurors will answer a series of questions about knowledge of or experience with Donald Trump and his circle:

There are still more questions:

The potential jurors are also asked whether they've read or listened to books and podcasts from Michael Cohen and Mark Pomerantz including "Disloyal: A Memoir," "Revenge," the "Mea Culpa" podcast, or "People Vs. Donald Trump." In addition, the pool must answer whether they've read or listened to audiobooks from Donald Trump. 

The final questions rounding out the lengthy questionnaire include:

And, finally, the last question: "Is there any reason, whether it be a bias or something else, that would prevent you from being fair and impartial if you are selected as a juror for this case?"

It's expected that the process of selecting the final 18 members — 12 jurors and six alternates — will take one to two weeks. If Monday was merely a preview of what's to come, this may be more of a spectacle than expected before a single witness is sworn in to testify.