Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Friday, September 12, 2008
Jonah Goldberg :: Townhall.com Columnist
Feminist Army Aims Its Cannons at Palin
by Jonah Goldberg
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
What was the biggest suprise of Election Day?



Whether or not Sarah Palin helps John McCain win the election, her greatest work may already be behind her. She's exposed the feminist con job.

Don't take my word for it. Feminists have been screaming like stuck pigs 24/7 since Palin was announced as McCain's running mate. (Are pig metaphors completely verboten now?)

Feminist author Cintra Wilson writes in Salon (a house organ of the angry left) that the notion of Palin as vice president is "akin to ideological brain rape." Presumably just before the nurse upped the dosage on her medication, Wilson continued, "Sarah Palin and her virtual burqa have me and my friends retching into our handbags. She's such a power-mad, backwater beauty-pageant casualty, it's easy to write her off and make fun of her. But in reality I feel as horrified as a ghetto Jew watching the rise of National Socialism."

And that's one of the nicer things she had to say. Really.

On Tuesday, Salon ran one article calling Palin a dominatrix ("a whip-wielding mistress") and another labeling her a sexually repressed fundamentalist no different from the Muslim fanatics and terrorists of Hamas. Make up your minds, folks. Is she a seductress or a sex-a-phobe?

But this any-weapon-near-to-hand approach is an obvious sign of how scared the Palin-o-phobes are.

Gloria Steinem, the grand mufti of feminism, issued a fatwa anathematizing Palin. A National Organization for Women spokeswoman proclaimed Palin more of a man than a woman. Wendy Doniger, a feminist academic at the University of Chicago, writes of Palin in Newsweek: "Her greatest hypocrisy is in her pretense that she is a woman."

It's funny. The left has been whining about having their patriotism questioned for so long it feels like they started griping in the Mesozoic era. Feminists have argued for decades that womanhood is an existential and metaphysical state of enlightenment. But they have no problem questioning whether women they hate are really women at all.

Since we know from basic science that Palin is a woman - she's had five kids, for starters - it's clear that these ideological thugs aren't talking about actual, you know, facts. They're doing what people of totalitarian mind-sets always do: bully heretics, demonize enemies, whip the troops into line.

The academic feminist left has scared the dickens out of mainstream men and women for so long, the liberal establishment is terrified to contradict feminists' nigh-upon-theological conviction that female authenticity is measured by one's blind loyalty to left-wing talking points. This is a version of the Marxist doctrine of "false consciousness," which holds that you aren't an authentic member of the proletariat unless you agree with Marxism.

It works like this: If you don't agree with feminist scolds, you're not a real woman, even if you're a very feminine working mom. But even if you're an actual man - never mind a childless feminist who looks like a Bulgarian weightlifter in drag - you're a "real woman" solely because you nod your head like a windup clapping monkey every time you read the latest editorial in Ms. Recall how they christened Bill Clinton the "first female president," too. Continued...

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | Next >
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Jonah Goldberg is editor-at-large of National Review Online.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read Jonah Goldberg's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
American Woman @ 10:41am
I hit a nerve. Madam, your comments belie your profound insecurity. My icons are Maggie Thatcher and Jeane Kirkpatrick. I wouldn't describe either one of those women as beautiful in appearance, yet that fact has no bearing on the value of each woman's opinions and beliefs. I would describe each as being endowed with a powerful intellect - a gift far more desireable than good fashion sense! You are suffering under a delusion if you believe that one's opinions and mind have any bearing on one's outward appearance. I firmly stand by my comments.

It's one thing to disagree vociferously with dissenting opinion, and perhaps you didn't learn this at fashion academy, there are rules of etiquette and discourse in life. Your position rings hollow because you are a hypocrite. Ignoring the substance of someone's argument and attacking his/her appearance is something liberals have been accused of doing to Sarah Palin in the column above. I don't like it from them, and I won't abide from you.

I'm not your enemy, but neither am I going to tolerate a double standard in the national discussion over women in public life. Whether I agree with someone or not, attacking his/her looks is beneath contempt. Yet, it is a common practice when women are involved. Perhaps you need to rethink your philosophy. As Jane Austen wrote, "Dress is at all times a frivolous distinction, and excessive solicitude about it often destroys its own aim."

Oh, and my original post was aimed at men here denigrating women based on physical appearance and confusing an opinion about a topic with the opiner's looks! A baconater is a fast food sandwich marketed to men.

Gestell, on ideological package dealing:
You are correct that many if not most of the feminists of the 20th century had more left wing leanings that rode shotgun to their other noteworthy social reform goals. Among these, the temperence movement, better treatment for the mentally ill, and female sufferage, along with initiatives in everything from health care to public schooling. But these are not the exclusive programs and advocacies of the Left. The Left for many decades has rode on the skirttails (rather than SHIRTTAILS, I guess) of other reform movements. Conservative Christian types were also abolitionists at an earlier time and then joined temperence movements and others. The package dealing of ideology is a dangerous thing. Some things go together naturally, yes. Example: Is public schooling, though certainly controversial for some of its more recent manifestations, really necessarily Marxists in outlook--or MUST it be. No. Of course not. And it was not always the reproductive system of liberalism, as one commentator noted. But it WAS mentioned by Karl Marx to be a compulsory way of inculcating certain ideas in the public. So is it by necessity left wing? Absurd.



Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.