Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Friday, August 08, 2008
Burt Prelutsky :: Townhall.com Columnist
The Myth of Moral Equivalency
by Burt Prelutsky
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Will Sarah Palin make a run at the GOP Nomination in 2012?


There was a time not all that long ago when most of us agreed about what constituted good and evil. But that time, I’m afraid, has come and gone and is now as passé as five cent cigars and 45 cents-a-gallon gasoline.

Our former sense of morality hasn’t been replaced by immorality, at least not entirely, but by something that’s probably more dangerous because it comes cleverly disguised as broad-mindedness. Those in the mass media and academia ridicule people who still believe there are nations, values and cultures, that are superior to others, and they regard those Americans who have the temerity to disagree with them as yokels, super patriots and religious hypocrites. The elitists trumpet moral equivalency as an ideal. And yet, time and again, they display their own double standards. The same folks who were so upset about George W. Bush’s time in the Air National Guard and his early problems with alcohol aren’t the least put out by Barack Obama’s avoidance of military service and his admitted use of illegal drugs. Apparently even moral equivalency doesn’t exist if one of the parties is a Republican and the other is a Democrat.

Steven Spielberg and his sophomoric cohorts got the moral equivalency ball rolling with “Munich,” a piece of Hollywood hooey that contended that there was no real difference between Palestinian cut-throats murdering 11 Israeli athletes at the ’72 Olympics and Israel’s tracking the murderers down and meting out justice.

More recently, we had Barack Obama’s insisting that Israel’s taking steps to defend itself against the constant missile attacks from Hamas is as inexcusable as the attacks, themselves. But then what can you expect from a guy who kept insisting that Iran wasn’t worth worrying about and that the Jews should seriously consider giving up half of Jerusalem to people who insist that any piece of real estate they covet is a holy Islamic city?

Those on the left regard themselves as the moral, as well as intellectual, superiors of those on the right because they claim to see shades of gray whereas conservatives see only black and white. The problem is that most things are black and white, and the inability to realize that doesn’t suggest clearer vision, but only lack of courage and conviction. So, while those on the right are convinced that capitalism, for instance, is better than communism and socialism, and have no problem saying as much, liberals go around parroting sound bites. They would have you believe that Guantanamo is the same as Buchenwald, Bush is the same as Hitler, and that the members of the U.S. military are either the same as storm troopers, in the words of Sen. Dick Durbin, or merely uneducated suckers, according to Sen. John Kerry.

It is not the height of sophistication to insist, as left-wingers do, that modern day Judaism and Christianity are no better than Islamic fundamentalism. When the Islamists are blowing up school buses and pizza parlors, flying jet planes into skyscrapers and beheading innocent human beings, to suggest that these blood-thirsty Neanderthals are the moral equals of Christians and Jews is not only absurd, it’s an evil slander of religious people who have never done anything wrong, and who are guilty of nothing worse than worshipping a God whose name doesn’t happen to be Allah.

Furthermore, when leftists claim that Israel is no better than its enemies, they are not merely mistaken, they are lying and, what’s more, they know it. After all, Israel is a western-style democracy. They don’t go in for honor killings. They don’t go in for suicide bombings. They don’t bestow honors on people who bash in the heads of little children. They even allow Israeli Arabs to vote and to hold elected office. What’s more, Israel is the only real ally America has in the Middle East, no matter how many bribes we pay out to the Arab world and no matter how much lip service our politicians pay to the likes of Egypt and Saudi Arabia.

Whenever I hear someone claim that he’s not an anti-Semite just because he’s always condemning Israel’s policies, I know he’s lying. On its worst day, Israel is better than Syria, Lebanon, and the Palestinian Authority. When a nation of five million Jews is surrounded by 150 million enemies who, day in and day out, plan and pray for its extermination, only a confirmed Jew-hater would insist that it’s Israel that must be reined in.

In conclusion, let me just say that moral equivalency may be a lot of things, but moral isn’t one of them.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
W. Burt Prelutsky is an accomplished, well-rounded writer and author of "The Secret of Their Success: Interviews with Legends and Luminaries."
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
Moral Sheep
Of course you all keep saying Burt took the words right out of your mouths. All I'm hearing is Baaa Baaa Baaa. It's not hard to take the words out of somebody's mouth when all they do is repeat what they've heard and then cheer themselves on for the repetition. Allow me to deal with just one of the absurdities in Burt's brain-dead diatribe:

"The same folks who were so upset about George W. Bush’s time in the Air National Guard and his early problems with alcohol aren’t the least put out by Barack Obama’s avoidance of military service and his admitted use of illegal drugs. Apparently even moral equivalency doesn’t exist if one of the parties is a Republican and the other is a Democrat."

Wrong. I don't care about Bush's "early problems with alcohol" any more than I care about Obama's "admitted use of illegal drugs." Nor do I care a bit for GW's National Guard experience or Obama's lack of the same. What bothers me is hypocrisy. It's GW in a flight suit on an aircraft carrier, and the right's puritan morality which irritates me. Pretend you're still a pilot GW - but don't use it to justify your unnecessary warfare. Drink all you want GW - but don't stuff your morality down our throats.

It's hypocrisy people. Hypocrisy. You'velearned it. Now you live it.

As for the rest of it, well, we really don't care what you do on your own time.

Morality is, by definition, relative. Look it up.

ists that they

Response to "Myth of Moral Equivalence"
There is no such thing as moral equivalence.

If we accept that murder is immoral, and is about the most immoral thing one can do, it is pointless to equate anything else to it. It is the pinnacle of evil. All other acts of immorality are lesser grades of evil. But, they are all still immoral and evil.

Accepting that a different culture in this day and age has a right to destroy its citizens if their regimes choose to is patently absurd. Yet, liberals excuse the horrific actions of dictators all the time.

If a race of pygmies that practiced human sacrifice were discovered living in a remote jungle in Africa, would anyone with any sense of morality excuse this practice. No. No one with morals would.

Yet liberals would. "The pigmies are only practicing what their culture believes in!" they would say. Yet, they do not extend this same defense of worship to Christian in their own country.

Liberals blind themselves to the evil in men such as Chavez (who now has revealed himself to be a dictator in Socialist clothing). But, they declare President Bush an imperialist "war criminal" for waging a war against Islamic jihadists.

Never mind that a leader such as Hugo Chavez has shut down opposition speech, has degreed himself the powers his constituents denied him before, and seeks to create a South American empire.

Liberals do not understand morality and so they seek to change its meaning. That way, they can live in the fantasy Socialist/Communist world without having to be responsible for the consequences of those policies.

Moral equivalence is simply a smoke screen for wanting to be free of responsibility from one's actions.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.