The Democrats are about to face a harsh reality. Some claimed President Trump’s airstrikes on Iran, which destroyed its military and political leaders and ended its nuclear ambitions, were illegal. Others argued Iran wasn't a threat, yet evidence showed they were preparing for a major attack on regional US military sites. Additionally, Iran admitted to having enough nuclear material for 11 bombs to our top negotiator, Steve Witkoff. Even NATO’s secretary-general stated that the now-ailing Islamic Republic was close to developing a nuclear weapon.
The Left has never looked so stupid. Again, it’s why we’re trusted to secure the homeland. Barack Obama’s legacy took a body blow when he gave the Iranians $100 billion not to pursue nukes—a lot of good that did.
Now, we have Nancy Pelosi wrecking the Democratic Party’s line of attack because she said then-President Barack Obama didn’t need permission to bomb Libya. We conducted airstrikes that helped the rebels turn the tide and oust Gaddafi. Rep. Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY) was asked what makes these strikes different from Obama’s Libyan campaign, and he was too stupid to answer the question.
NEW: I asked House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY) about Nancy Pelosi saying in 2011 that President Obama didn't need Congressional approval to bomb Libya, but Dems now say President Trump needs approval to bomb Iran?
— Bill Melugin (@BillMelugin_) March 3, 2026
Jeffries said Iran is "very different" & told me "I… pic.twitter.com/SkLr1R5wr1
FLASHBACK
— Townhall.com (@townhallcom) March 2, 2026
Reporter: "You're saying that [Obama] did not need authorization initially and still doesn't need authorization [to strike] Libya?"
Pelosi: "Yes."
🤡
Rules for thee, not for me ... according to Democrats.pic.twitter.com/G3RVjRwRPH
That was tough. Also, wrong, Jeffries. You’re just wrong.
NATO's Rutte on Iran:
— Clash Report (@clashreport) March 3, 2026
Iran is close to getting its hand on a nuclear capability and on a ballistic missile capability. pic.twitter.com/UF7YAgEy5Y