You can learn a bit about an organization based on who it supports for Congress. Whether it endorses Republicans or Democrats gives voters a superficial insight into how it thinks and what’s important to it. More telling is who it opposes. More telling still is why it opposes a particular candidate.
One such group making endorsements these days is Indivisible Action, a left-wing political action committee connected with the larger Indivisible movement that supports and helps fund No Kings protests across the nation. It recently weighed-in on the primary election to determine the Democratic Farmer-Labor nominee in Minnesota’s U.S. Senate race, and Indivisible wants people to nominate the state’s Lieutenant Governor Peggy Flanagan over Rep. Angie Craig.
Fair enough. There’s nothing wrong with a “Vote for Flanagan” campaign. Indivisible simply prefers one candidate over another. Flanagan and Craig both won their respective elections in 2018, so neither is a newcomer to Democrat politics. Both check different boxes in their party’s identity litmus test; Flanagan ran as a member of the Ojibwe tribe of Indians, while Craig is a lesbian married to another woman. Either would likely perform well in the general election but in this Senate primary, only one has a congressional voting record to evaluate.
Craig is a solid Democrat. The AFL-CIO’s voting record scorecard gives her a 99 percent lifetime rating, and the Democrat-aligned group Defend the Vote gives Craig an "A" rating. On the other side of the partisan ledger, the conservative group Heritage Action gives Craig a lifetime voting score of 2 percent, so both parties agree on her liberal bona fides. But this isn’t good enough for Indivisible.
“Angie Craig is not your friend,” reads the group’s March 7 endorsement email. According to Indivisible, she lost the endorsement because of three sins: Voting for a bill calling for the detention of illegal aliens who commit crimes; voting for a resolution saying attacks on law enforcement and immigration facilities are wrong; and, apparently worst of all, her campaign has taken money from Jews. “The dirty cherry on top of all of this,” according to Indivisible, is that “her biggest contributor to her last campaign was…AIPAC!” (Punctuation marks in original).
It’s difficult to understand how Indivisible’s “Commitment to Nonviolence” includes denouncing reliable Democrats who think arresting criminals is good and attacking law enforcement is bad, but that reflects how the party’s base is trending in 2026. As for accepting contributions from Jews, Craig’s campaign received $327,675 through the American Israel Public Affairs Committee in the 2024 election cycle. By Indivisible’s standards, this is disqualifying; thou shall not accept money from Jews.
The anti-Jewish trend among Democrats is troubling at best and evil at worst. Indivisible’s position echoes that of the Democratic National Committee’s autopsy on Kamala Harris’s 2024 presidential campaign. It concluded, in part, that Harris’s defeat hinged on her position, and that of the Biden administration, of being insufficiently pro-Palestinian and too supportive of Israel’s response to the October 7, 2023, Hamas slaughter of more than 1,200 people, including 46 Americans.
In the lexicon of software engineers, being anti-Jewish is not a bug, it’s a feature of the Democrat base today. Militant agitation by Indivisible and like-minded groups is pushing their party farther to the left with every election cycle and Craig knows it. She penned a column for the Minnesota Star Tribune last week expressing regret for her vote on the Laken Riley Act so she knows she’s in trouble. Whether she apologizes for voting to support law enforcement and accepting contributions from Jews is another question.
This latest example of anti-Jewish sentiment among Democrats is part of an ongoing narrative to demonize American Jews and Israel. While the language may differ from that of Iran’s theocracy or terrorist groups like Hamas, the bigotry is little different. That one of America’s major political parties is embracing this worldview is a national disgrace. When a political party targeted Jews 90 years ago it was catastrophic, and we don’t need it or want it here. Indivisible has been a vocal backer of No Kings protests and they’re now sowing the seeds of a No Jews movement. Their claims of inclusion exceed mere hypocrisy; their intolerance is frightening and damnable.