Schumer’s Activist Judges
American Hostage Taken by the Taliban Is Finally Back Home
Chris Cuomo Delivers the Perfect Response to This Viewer's Criticism of His Trump...
We Have Ambushed the Left
President Trump Has Something Special for the Rescued Astronauts
State Lawmakers are Pushing More Anti-Gunner Nonsense
Jury Convicts Men Who Tried to Assassinate Iranian Dissident
Hamas Better Hope Israel Doesn't Follow Through on Their Latest Threat
NYT Lies About Elon Musk Receiving China Briefing, Trump Shuts Them Down
North Carolina One Step Closer Toward Reducing Violent Crime
Really?! Joe and Jill Biden Still Want to Campaign With Democrats
This Major US Company Just Scaled Back Its Diversity Programs
USAID Caught Red-Handed in Censorship Conspiracy
Good News, Bad News in the New Fox Poll -- For Both Sides
Jordan Seeks Answers From Patel After Being Stonewalled by Wray on FBI-Financial Instituti...
Tipsheet

Judge Rejects Democrat-Led Effort to Stop DOGE Access

Photo/Alex Brandon

A federal judge in Washington, D.C., has blocked an attempt to stop the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) mass firings and the restrictions on federal data access. This ruling comes as the Trump administration faces increasing opposition from bureaucrats concerned about transparency and the downsizing of government agencies. This latest legal battle further intensifies the ongoing debate over the future of government efficiency reforms under the Trump administration. 

Advertisement

On Tuesday, U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan rejected an emergency appeal from 14 Democratic-led states seeking to block cost-reduction measures and prevent DOGE from proceeding with its restructuring plans. The states had requested a temporary restraining order, but the judge ruled against the motion, allowing the administration’s efforts to continue unimpeded. 

“Plaintiffs legitimately call into question what appears to be the unchecked authority of an unelected individual and an entity that was not created by Congress and over which it has no oversight,” she said. “In these circumstances, it must be indisputable that this court acts within the bounds of its authority. Accordingly, it cannot issue a TRO, especially one as wide-ranging as the Plaintiff's request, without clear evidence of imminent, irreparable harm to these Plaintiffs. The current record does not meet that standard.” 

She argued that the plaintiffs failed to meet the “high standard for irreparable injury.” She noted that their claims were based on media reports speculating on potential financial or programmatic harm if DOGE continues its aggressive restructuring. She likened this to Musk’s previous description of USAID as going through a “woodchipper.” 

Advertisement

New Mexico Attorney General Raul Torrez initially filed the lawsuit. He asserted, "There is no greater threat to democracy than the accumulation of state power in the hands of a single, unelected individual.” 

The lawsuit also involved attorney generals from Arizona, California, Connecticut, Hawaii, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, and Washington. 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement