Why Is the Acting Secret Service Director Heaping Praise on Mayorkas?
The Usual Suspects Are Very Mad Terrorists Are Dying
NYT Article on Secret Service's Warning to Trump Golfing Contradicts Acting Director's Rem...
The New York Times Tried to Bait JD Vance, But He Was Ready...
The Teamsters Just Delivered a Body Blow to Kamala
Viewers Debate If They Should Keep Watching David Muir, and PBS...Questions Election Integ...
Agent 00-Zero
Virginia Democrat Silent As Biden-Harris Border Crisis Creeps Into State
What Did 'Broadband Czar' Harris Do With the $40 Billion Appropriated for Internet?
Politico Points to 'Warning Signs' of Harris-Walz Campaign
This Blue State Just Made a Bombshell Admission Just Months Before the Election
Harris-Walz Want to Take Your Guns Away
A ‘Trans’ Actor Was Nominated for ‘Best Supporting Actress’
Kamala Harris Still Has the Worst Answers on What to Do About Grocery...
Federal Reserve Cuts Interest Rates for the First Time in Four Years
Tipsheet

George Will: Fred Thompson Ain't <i>All That ...</i>

Columnist George Will is taking a few shots at Fred Thompson:

Thompson has never had to show consuming energy as a candidate, never having been in a closely contested race. He won his two elections with 60 percent of the Tennessee vote in 1994 (for the remaining two years of Al Gore's Senate term) and 61 percent in 1996. He did not seek reelection in 2002 -- not a painful sacrifice for a man who disliked the Senate: "I'm not 30 years old. I don't want to spend the rest of my life up here. I don't like spending 14- and 16-hour days voting on 'sense of the Senate' resolutions on irrelevant matters."

... Is he wise? As a senator he insistently advocated increasing the government's regulation of politics. One of only four senators who supported John McCain's candidacy in 2000, Thompson argued for the McCain-Feingold legislation that regulates the content, timing and amount of political speech.

In 1996, Thompson worked successfully, unfortunately, to preserve the (currently collapsing) system of public financing of presidential campaigns. His arguments were replete with all the rhetoric standard among advocates of government regulation of political speech: Government regulation of politics is necessary to dispel "cynicism" about government (has that worked?), to create a "level playing field" and to prevent politics from being "awash with money" (Congressional Record, May 20, 1996).

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement