Is Hollywood Unwokening?
Columbia University's Pro-Hamas Activists Vow to Defend Camp Against Police Action
Capitalism Versus Racism
Groupthink Chorus Emerges at Trump Trial
Anti-Censorship Group Canceled by Pro-Hamas Authors
Mike Johnson Is a Hero
City Where Emergency Response Time Is 36 Minutes Wants to Ban Civilians Carrying...
There's No Right to Sleep Outdoors
State Department: Ukraine Has 'Significant' Human Rights Issues
The Alarming Implications of Trump's Immunity Claim
In Every Generation They Try to Destroy Us
Love to See It: Cathy McMorris Rodgers, Ted Cruz Fight to Protect Public...
1968 Returns as Biden’s Nightmare
The Greatest Challenge to DeSantis' Legacy in Florida
Senate Passes Foreign Aid Package, Sending It to President Biden to Sign
Tipsheet

Irony: Abortion Leaders Condemn Trump for Not Recognizing MS-13 As People

Cecile Richards, former President of Planned Parenthood, and Ilyse Hogue, head of the abortion advocacy group NARAL, both had harsh words for President Trump Wednesday over his comments that MS-13 “aren’t people. These are animals.”

Advertisement

Trump's remarks were widely taken by many in the media to be referring to all illegal immigrants. While Richards, NARAL, and Planned Parenthood all seemed to be interpreting the remarks to mean all illegal immigrants, the full context of the remarks seems to show that the president was referring to the violent MS-13 gang.

Richards, the recently retired head of the nation’s largest abortion provider, called on the president to do some “serious self-reflection.”

Planned Parenthood, the organization that performed 321,384 abortions over this past year according to their latest annual report, denounced Trump's remarks as "hateful."  

NARAL denounced the “dehumanizing, racist rhetoric.” The abortion advocacy group’s head, Ilyse Hogue, claimed the remarks put the country in “extremely dangerous territory.”

Advertisement

While these abortion leaders are clear on the humanity of MS-13 gang members, they are a little hazy on when that humanity begins.

Cecile Richards claimed once in an interview that the question of when life begins is not “relevant to the conversation” of abortion but, when pressed, said that “for her” life began at delivery.

“For you, when does life start? When does a human being become a human being?” she was asked by Jorge Ramos.

“I'm the mother of three children,” she told him. “For me, life began when I delivered them.”

Ilyse Hogue argued in an op-ed for CNBC that the conversation about when life begins “belongs with our scientists, our clergy, and our families,” and also claimed that life beginning at conception “goes against legal precedent, science, and public opinion.” Hogue did not venture her own opinion of when life begins.

Advertisement

Some on Twitter called out the irony of abortion groups denouncing "dehumanizing" rhetoric.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement