NBC News Really Thought They Had Something With This ICE Story, Huh?
Here's How You Know the Libs Are Melting Down Over FIFA Awarding Trump...
Watch Bill Maher and This Lefty Commentator Take a Sledgehammer to Liberalism
Did You Miss Joe Biden's Brutal Gaffe Last Week?
Don't Fall for the Memory-Holing Dems Are Doing Regarding Airstrikes on Narco-Terrorists
Nick Fuentes Seems Popular—Until You See Where His Clicks Come From
Check Out Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson's 'No Kings' Meltdown
Classroom Segregation Is Back, This Time Enforced by a 'Gender-Nonbinary' Activist
WH Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt Just Nuked Dems on the Affordability Crisis They...
Hollywood’s Diversity Bubble Pops: Half of LGBTQ TV Characters Set to Disappear Next...
Mamdani's DSA Comrade Calla Walsh Is Back and Calling for the Dismantling of...
Tim Walz Gets Testy With a Reporter Who Asked About Jailing Fraudsters
It’s Obama’s Double-Tap
Let’s Listen to Burke, Part One
Who Sold You That Bill of Goods?
Tipsheet

Study Shows Ethanol Produces Worse 'Global Warming' Pollution Than Gasoline

Well, this is going to be a heartbreaker for the hysterical global warming crowd. According to a new study, emissions from burning corn are worse for the environment and produce more CO2 or 'global warming' gases than the burning of traditional gasoline.

Advertisement
Biofuels made from the leftovers of harvested corn plants are worse than gasoline for global warming in the short term, a study shows, challenging the Obama administration's conclusions that they are a much cleaner oil alternative and will help combat climate change.

A $500,000 study paid for by the federal government and released Sunday in the peer-reviewed journal Nature Climate Change concludes that biofuels made with corn residue release 7 percent more greenhouse gases in the early years compared with conventional gasoline.

The federal government has already dumped billions of dollars into facilities and programs producing biofuels in the name of preventing climate change but as usual, is having the opposite effect than originally intended.

Just last week, biofuel industry producers told the New York Times 2016 was the year they were looking most forward to bring cleaner energy to the United States. Oops.

Advertisement

“The whole purpose of the Renewable Fuel Standard was to encourage investment to create brand-new technologies that would help the United States become more energy-independent and use cleaner and more efficient fuels. We feel like we are just on the verge of doing that and now the E.P.A. is talking about changing the rules," Executive Vice President of the heavily subsidized biofuel company Abengoa Christopher Standlee said to the paper.

Al Gore, call your office.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement