Democrats' Insane, Anti-American Behavior
No, Chris Van Hollen, You Didn't Just Do *That* After Meeting Wife-Beating MS-13...
Congrats, Democrats, You Played Yourselves
Why Gary Shapley Won't Be Acting Commissioner of the IRS
Here's When a Lefty Trump Supporter Stunned CNN When Debating That Deported Illegal...
Here's What Happens if Judge James Boasberg Goes Through With Contempt Proceedings Against...
New York AG Letitia James Breaks Her Silence on Fraud Allegations
Former President Who Struggles Speaking Now Struggles Landing Speaking Gigs
How Colorado's New Gun Law Accomplishes Nothing But Create Animosity
Why Every Gun Control Argument Crumbles After FSU Shooting
Joe Biden’s $300K Speaking Fee Bombs As Bookings Stall
Senate Aides Say Chris Van Hollen’s Trip To El Salvador Likely Paid For...
MSNBC Spends More Time Defending MS-13 Suspect Abrego Garcia Than Discussing His Crimes
Rubio to Russia and Ukraine: Make Peace Now—or America Walks
Trump Loses It Over Jerome Powell Again
Tipsheet

McConnell: The House Kept Its Repeal Pledge, Now It's Our Turn

The Senate Republican Leader reacts to last evening's vote in the House, underscoring the point that the lower chamber's action merely represents the first step down the long path toward full repeal:
Advertisement




"The Democratic leadership in the Senate doesn't want to vote on this bill, but I assure you -- we will."

How might McConnell deliver on that promise?  Heritage's Brian Darling suggests invoking "rule 22," a tactic Democrats could thwart, but not without making fools of themselves in the process (via Allahpundit):

The House will pass H.R. 2 this week. Once that bill is passed, it will be sent to the Senate for consideration. Once the Senate receives the bill, any Senator can use Rule 14 to object to the second reading of the bill. This procedural objection will “hold at the desk” the House-passed bill and allow the Senate to act on the full repeal measure.

If the bill is referred to committee, it will never get to the Senate floor. 

If any Senator can gather 16 signatures on a cloture petition, then they could file that petition with the clerk of the Senate. This would commence a proceeding that would end with a vote requiring 60 votes to shut off debate on a motion to proceed to a full repeal of Obamacare within two days of the filing of the petition. It is expected that Senate liberals would use Rule 22 to filibuster a full repeal of Obamacare. This would put many Senate Democrats in the interesting situation of voicing support for so-called “filibuster reform” while at the same time using the filibuster rule to block an up or down vote on Obamacare.
Advertisement

Senate Democrats may face the following dilemma: Entertain their short-sighted filibuster reform fetish, or shelter their massive, unaffordable government intrusion into healthcare from Republican interference? I have a sneaking suspicion which priority would win out.

Parting Thought: Even if the GOP wins back the Senate in 2012 (which is looking more promising by the day) and even manages to recapture the White House, Democrats could still just filibuster Obamacare repeal into oblivion, right? 

Maybe not.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement